Ok. So we all know that 962 is very vague in defining what is handgun ammo. In fact that is the basis of Parker v. California challenging 962. So here is my thought/question. Since the law does not define what is handgun ammo could it be as simple as the retailer asking the purchaser "Is this ammo for a handgun or a rifle?" If it's for a handgun then you have to go through the BS and if it's for a rifle you don't? Of course we all know there are carbines in virtually every caliber so virtually all ammo could be for a rifle. I'm not saying all retailers would do it that way but if doing it this way complies with the law I'm sure some of our Calguns friendly retailers would do it this way.
What say you Calguns (especially "The Right People").
What say you Calguns (especially "The Right People").
Comment