Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

NRA Grades Whitman C+ and Brown D

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sfbadger
    Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 320

    Gun ownership doesn't equate to being a Republican. I happen to be a Democrat who likes guns, ... a lot, yet I'm also voting for Cooley and probably Fiorino, ... maybe? (at least NOT voting for Boxer)

    Comment

    • chris
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2006
      • 19447

      Originally posted by HondaMasterTech
      As much as I believe Brown will support 2nd Amendment issues, I will never forget that he supports AB32. AB32 is going to cost Californian's so much money to implement it's scary.

      i'm very affraid what that law will do jobs in this state. what jobs that are left. and gas will go way higher than it is allready with that law also.
      http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
      sigpic
      Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
      contact the governor
      https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
      In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
      NRA Life Member.

      Comment

      • Sgt Raven
        Veteran Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 3808

        Originally posted by SideWinder11
        Nope you got it wrong we all lose. You'll be on here before long post whoring trying to get your post count up talking about how crappy things are in CA before long.
        You come here complaining about your beloved eMeg Whitless having been called a WHORE, yet you say a member here will be a post whore. Pot meet Kettle.
        sigpic
        DILLIGAF
        "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
        "Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
        "The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"

        Comment

        • SideWinder11
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 1324

          Originally posted by Sgt Raven
          You come here complaining about your beloved eMeg Whitless having been called a WHORE, yet you say a member here will be a post whore. Pot meet Kettle.
          But he was called one 2 times in one of his threads.



          I thought it was a term of endearment LOL

          Comment

          • SideWinder11
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 1324

            Originally posted by HondaMasterTech
            As much as I believe Brown will support 2nd Amendment issues, I will never forget that he supports AB32. AB32 is going to cost Californian's so much money to implement it's scary.


            Thankfully, I have the joy of watching this race from my new home.
            I agree!



            SO then I can conculde that everyone who is voting for JB is also voting NO on Prop 23 right??

            Who's the first to step up and be a hypocrite????

            It's like a group buy. List your name below.

            1.Doheny
            2.Sgt. Raven
            3.
            4.
            5.
            6.
            7.
            8.
            9.
            10.

            Comment

            • bwiese
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Oct 2005
              • 27621

              Originally posted by SideWinder11
              I posted in another thread that my local gun shop has Meg Whitman stickers in his gun case and when I told him about Calguns he was BLOWN AWAY!
              Which just further goes to prove gunshops are often founts of bad gun law information as well as bad gun politics information.

              Perhaps your personal limitations necessitate you pandering to someone who you think can remotely affect your job. Me, I roll with whatever happens because I keep my skills up and am flexible.

              Bill Wiese
              San Jose, CA

              CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
              sigpic
              No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
              to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
              ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
              employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
              legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

              Comment

              • Alexthewelder
                Senior Member
                • May 2009
                • 878

                Originally posted by bwiese
                Which just further goes to prove gunshops are often founts of bad gun law information as well as bad gun politics information.

                Perhaps your personal limitations necessitate you pandering to someone who you think can remotely affect your job. Me, I roll with whatever happens because I keep my skills up and am flexible.
                exactly. Its always seems like gunshops really want you in fear so that you will just buy more. MEG HATES GUNS! I can see it now- meg gets elected then the gun shop tells you to buy more guns because a new law is in effect where if anything gun related is purchased after the day you visit his store it will be confiscated by federal agents....ooooooooo ssccaaarrrrrrryyyyy cash only credit card +5%.... Uhhhh ya ,... its cuz the democrats are charging more taxes!!! oooooooo ohhhhhhhh scarrrrrierrrrrr

                Republican - democrat they all front , they all lie. Its all about what kind of art your into. they all paint a pretty picture but its just a picture. dont be a lolli pop
                AK BUILD PARTY OCT 16th, 2010
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=333079
                AK BUILD PARTY JULY 17th, 2010
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=308158
                AK BUILD PARTY MAR ?, 2010
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=263078
                AK BUILD PARTY DEC 5th, 2009
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=235197

                Comment

                • inbox485
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 3677

                  Originally posted by oni.dori
                  Ok, I think I understand what you are saying now. Essentially, the state is nearly 100% definitely going to fall on its face and fail, so it's better that it happens under a Dem/Lib's "rule", rather than a Repub/Conserv's "rule", so that way the Dem's/Lib's (by default) inherit the blame. I guess that makes some kind of sense.
                  The state fell on its face over a year ago. The sensation just hasn't set in yet. I've yet to even see a theory that could save CA from eventually filling bankruptcy. Any word on that from any of the candidates?
                  Up for rent...

                  Comment

                  • bwiese
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 27621

                    Originally posted by inbox485
                    The state fell on its face over a year ago. The sensation just hasn't set in yet. I've yet to even see a theory that could save CA from eventually filling bankruptcy. Any word on that from any of the candidates?
                    California is a net output state. The value of goods & services it produces are far far more than any intake from the gov't - even accounting for illegals, etc.

                    In fact with all the Fed taxes paid and goods/services produced, California supports a tremendous number of 'loser' neighboring states (OR,ID,NV,UT, AZ, WY, etc.) These latter states have more Fed intake (fed gov't jobs, social security, farm/crop subsidies, retirements, Medicare/SSI) than any outgo or goods & services.

                    Paying less to the Feds would actually let us get back into reasonable shape even "the way we are", without fixing much.

                    Bill Wiese
                    San Jose, CA

                    CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                    sigpic
                    No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                    to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                    ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                    employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                    legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                    Comment

                    • inbox485
                      Veteran Member
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 3677

                      Originally posted by bwiese
                      California is a net output state. The value of goods & services it produces are far far more than any intake from the gov't - even accounting for illegals, etc.

                      In fact with all the Fed taxes paid and goods/services produced, California supports a tremendous number of 'loser' neighboring states (OR,ID,NV,UT, AZ, WY, etc.) These latter states have more Fed intake (fed gov't jobs, social security, farm/crop subsidies, retirements, Medicare/SSI) than any outgo or goods & services.

                      Paying less to the Feds would actually let us get back into reasonable shape even "the way we are", without fixing much.
                      That's all good and well, but CA's output in government spending also far outpaces it's intake. I'd say it went critical last year if not earlier.
                      Up for rent...

                      Comment

                      • mblat
                        Veteran Member
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 3339

                        Originally posted by bwiese
                        Paying less to the Feds would actually let us get back into reasonable shape even "the way we are", without fixing much.
                        sigpic
                        The essence of Western civilization is the Magna Carta, not the Magna Mac. The fact that non-Westerners may bite into the later has no implications for their accepting the former.
                        S.P. Huntington.



                        EDIT 2020: To be fair that seems to apply to many Westerners also.

                        Comment

                        • patrick fox
                          Junior Member
                          • May 2009
                          • 10

                          chelene nightingale for me!!

                          Originally posted by Gryff
                          We're so screwed for the next four years...
                          Well maybe not !!! we could vote for chelne nightingal, she is very pro gun and 2nd ammendment along with constituitional beleiver and follower!!seems like she is a no excuse kinda lady, that won't take much b.s. from other politicians, check her out at her web site, she is endorsed by sheriff apario of arizona, who thinks all legal citizens should have guns ,, so i'm giving my vote to her, neither jerry or meg has earned my respect or confidience....

                          Comment

                          • inbox485
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 3677

                            Originally posted by patrick fox
                            Well maybe not !!! we could vote for chelne nightingal, she is very pro gun and 2nd ammendment along with constituitional beleiver and follower!!seems like she is a no excuse kinda lady, that won't take much b.s. from other politicians, check her out at her web site, she is endorsed by sheriff apario of arizona, who thinks all legal citizens should have guns ,, so i'm giving my vote to her, neither jerry or meg has earned my respect or confidience....
                            Right.... Hate to break it to the "stick it to the man" types here, but her chances of winning the election died in March. And by dead, I mean still born. Her chances never had legs to walk on to begin with. Instead of throwing your vote away, vote between the best of the viables, look into what it takes to make it out of the primaries as a viable candidate and better luck in 4 years.
                            Up for rent...

                            Comment

                            • Excedrin
                              Junior Member
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 9

                              Originally posted by ZX-10R
                              I want someone who has really done something and building up a multimillion $$$ company is a lot better on a resume than saying you are a life long politician.

                              ...

                              We need change not THE PAST. This is not Obama vs McCain. This is better...WE actually have a very well qualified person in Meg who actually has some credibility compared to Obama who is really a mystery. We know everything about Brown already as some of you seem to repeat so the questions is do we want a repeat of it?

                              I want no ill will with a fellow shooter. Please accept in advance my apologies. I just want a better CA.
                              This idea that Meg Whitman is a competent business leader is false. She has consistently failed at every business she's been CEO of (Stride Rite, FTD, Hasbro). Six months after joining eBay, they went public. The IPO process had begun long before she joined, she had zero positive impact.

                              Here's a good expose about her.

                              Comment

                              • sfbadger
                                Member
                                • Nov 2007
                                • 320

                                Originally posted by inbox485
                                And by dead, I mean still born. Her chances never had legs to walk on to begin with.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1