Why you should follow DoJ guidelines for fixed mags

[simonov]

California law defines a fixed magazine as one that requires a tool (such as a bullet tip) to remove.

The DoJ insists in a memo that a fixed magazine must somehow be "permanently" attached to the weapon (epoxy, welding, rivets, etc).

When the JBTs come for you and your guns, you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

Food for thought.

[Super_tactical]

California law defines a fixed magazine as one that requires a tool (such as a bullet tip) to remove.

The DoJ insists in a memo that a fixed magazine must somehow be "permanently" attached to the weapon (epoxy, welding, rivets, etc).

When the JBTs come for you and your guns, you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

Food for thought.

bah...

[Nefarious]

bah...

+1
I better swap out my builds for a Carbon 15

[Surveyor]

California law defines a fixed magazine as one that requires a tool (such as a bullet tip) to remove.

The DoJ insists in a memo that a fixed magazine must somehow be "permanently" attached to the weapon (epoxy, welding, rivets, etc).

When the JBTs come for you and your guns, you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

Food for thought.

If the Bullet Button itself was easily removed, I would tend to agree with you. The BB has to be hammered into your receiver after filing down the back edge of the button. It takes a little bit of skill and effort, to be honest. However, once it's in there, it aint coming out without a vice and some locking plyers. If they are willing to rip out my BB with tools or if they plant a high-cap mag in place of my 10 rounder (in the mag well), then no epoxyed in place mag would've saved me.

[hoffmang]

siminov,

Are you arguing that we should accept lawlessness from our law enforcers?

Kind of sounds like Southern Governors in the 1960's. "Those agitators should stop causing trouble."

One of the interesting factors of the bullet button is that there is no configuration of the firearm that doesn't show that the firearm is incapable of accepting detachable magazines. It either is incapable, or it has the bullet button removed.

-Gene

[mcubed4130]

California law defines a fixed magazine as one that requires a tool (such as a bullet tip) to remove.

The DoJ insists in a memo that a fixed magazine must somehow be "permanently" attached to the weapon (epoxy, welding, rivets, etc).

When the JBTs come for you and your guns, you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

Food for thought.

With examples such as - a M1919A4 .30cal semi-auto, is thought to be a 50cal machine gun... Do you really think this will make any difference?

-M3

[arguy15]

With this logic in mind a valid question would be "Can someone tell me how to permanently modify my SKS so that I can never take out the magazine?" Being that this is a BS it doesn't matter.

[simonov]

Are you arguing that we should accept lawlessness from our law enforcers?

I'm suggesting that spending a few weeks or months in county jail could ruin your whole year.

[hoffmang]

I'm suggesting that spending a few weeks or months in county jail could ruin your whole year.

And I'm suggesting to you that putting up with injustice only leads to more injustice.

I can afford to sit in jail when I'm right and the state is wrong. You should think about why you can't. I'm also not speaking monetarily.

-Gene

[Wizard99]

Sounds like the very definition of Fascism: Political rule through fear.

[scewper]

You don't make any sense.

you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

That is the idea... Removing magazines with tools is not against the law. If you were able to insert a magazine that could be removed without the use of a tool, then that is against the law. However, when you insert a new magazine into a rifle equipped with a bulletbutton type lock, you will need a tool to remove it.

[bobfried]

I'm suggesting that spending a few weeks or months in county jail could ruin your whole year.

I would hate to but wouldn't be afraid of it. Honestly, do you think it will make a difference? If they wanted to put your *** in jail it doesn't matter how you configured your rifle.

And sorry but your idea of permanent is idiotic at best. I can shove ANY high cap magazines into ANY semi automatic rifle with some work. Give me a sledge hammer and plasma cutter and I can jam 30 round mags into all kind of rifle.

Your logic is highly flawed. With the assumptions you made, an LEO can come into your house, build a pipe bomb with what you have laying around than arrest you for it.

I am getting tired of these un-educated, un-research, wild *** guesses than have been coming out lately.

[FinweElensar]

Guys, he's just trying to get your blood pressure up, get more traffic for his retarded site.

[simonov]

Your logic is highly flawed. With the assumptions you made, an LEO can come into your house, build a pipe bomb with what you have laying around than arrest you for it.

You don't think that's ever happened?

Why make it easier for them?

[KenpoProfessor]

California law defines a fixed magazine as one that requires a tool (such as a bullet tip) to remove.

The DoJ insists in a memo that a fixed magazine must somehow be "permanently" attached to the weapon (epoxy, welding, rivets, etc).

When the JBTs come for you and your guns, you might be very happy that your magazines cannot be removed with any tool the JBTs are carrying with them.

Food for thought.

Here's the rub, it would still be A TOOL and the definition is clear and concise that a TOOL be used. No different than an SKS or clone.

Have a great Kenpo day

Clyde