Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people listen when "The Right People" talk...
Collapse
X
-
Some people listen when "The Right People" talk...
Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.Last edited by hill billy; 09-04-2010, 1:20 PM.Tags: None -
From the article:
From this forum (re: Man Sues For Right to Carry Gun Near School):In March, a federal judge in Seattle ruled against Warden, finding the city was within its rights to restrict guns in "sensitive" areas such as schools and courthouses.
Hmmmmm.... Looks like wisdom to me.If this case proceeds then the area in 1000' of a school in Oregon, Hawaii, Washington, Alaska, Nevada and California will be deemed a sensitive place. -
Let's have City States!
Why not go back to a feudal system like Oakland and San Francisco and Chicago where every city is it's own state and make up it own laws. (being sarcastic here) But that's what it seems like to me. Each has it's own Lord Mayor!Always remember to pillage before you burn.Comment
-
The bolded part is the part I like...By Jim Brunner
Seattle Times political reporter
But the gun ban remains on indefinite hold pending the outcome of a separate, state court case, according to the Seattle City Attorney's Office.
Robert Warden sued Seattle in November after carrying a pistol into a community center and being asked to leave. In March, a federal judge in Seattle ruled against Warden, finding the city was within its rights to restrict guns in "sensitive" areas such as schools and courthouses.
Warden, a Kent attorney, initially appealed that ruling, but withdrew his appeal Thursday. In a statement, Warden said other lawsuits around the country are well positioned to resolve the question of what sorts of firearms restrictions cities can enact in sensitive areas.
In any event, Seattle's gun ban won't be enforced while the city appeals a February ruling by a King County Superior Court judge, who found the gun ban violated state law. Cities and towns cannot impose their own firearms restrictions because that's up to the state Legislature, the judge ruled.
Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn has vowed to continue fighting to uphold the ban, which was enacted last year by the previous mayor, Greg Nickels...

.........STGC(SW)

SAF Life Member
sigpic
NRA BenefactorComment
-
Bob Warden and I massively tangled over this issue last November on OpenCarry.org's forums when he announced that the state plaintiffs (of which I was one of them) did not have standing because of what happened from Parker to Heller (applying DC's difficult Navegar standard to state court actions which are not applicable, and shortly thereafter, what did the city of Seattle do? Attack our standing, of course). He essentially publicly declared that SAF was doing it wrong because we were not following the Heller path of applying for something or being kicked out.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...bancase03.html
Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.
As a result of the continual standing attacks by Bob and concerns about this, decided to get booted out Seattle parks facilities (Ray Carter by far wins for the most interesting method of getting booted). I, however, refused to cooperate with it, even if it meant that I was tossed out as a plaintiff by the judge for lack of standing. As many of the folks here can attest, I am a stubborn son of a *****.
In the end, Superior Court Judge Schaefer stated that I had standing. I won that argument (the Seattle is still attacking our standing in the appellate court, saying that we "made up our standing").Comment
-
I agree, there is no part better than the hole.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...bancase03.html
Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.Originally posted by Paladin(Please skip the lame "two weeks" replies.)Originally posted by Ford8NIf I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. Senator Dianne Feinstein, CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,170
Posts: 25,040,982
Members: 354,530
Active Members: 5,844
Welcome to our newest member, Boocatini.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3176 users online. 50 members and 3126 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment