Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Some people listen when "The Right People" talk...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hill billy
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Mar 2008
    • 2890

    Some people listen when "The Right People" talk...



    Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.
    Last edited by hill billy; 09-04-2010, 1:20 PM.
    New and Reloaded Ammunition for sale!
  • #2
    GrizzlyGuy
    Gun Runner to The Stars
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • May 2009
    • 5468

    From the article:

    In March, a federal judge in Seattle ruled against Warden, finding the city was within its rights to restrict guns in "sensitive" areas such as schools and courthouses.
    From this forum (re: Man Sues For Right to Carry Gun Near School):

    If this case proceeds then the area in 1000' of a school in Oregon, Hawaii, Washington, Alaska, Nevada and California will be deemed a sensitive place.
    Hmmmmm.... Looks like wisdom to me.
    Gun law complexity got you down? Get the FAQs, Jack!

    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      psango
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      • Jul 2009
      • 1302

      Let's have City States!

      Why not go back to a feudal system like Oakland and San Francisco and Chicago where every city is it's own state and make up it own laws. (being sarcastic here) But that's what it seems like to me. Each has it's own Lord Mayor!
      Last edited by psango; 09-04-2010, 1:38 PM. Reason: Let's have City States!
      Always remember to pillage before you burn.

      Comment

      • #4
        Legasat
        Intergalactic Member
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Mar 2009
        • 4151

        By Jim Brunner

        Seattle Times political reporter

        But the gun ban remains on indefinite hold pending the outcome of a separate, state court case, according to the Seattle City Attorney's Office.

        Robert Warden sued Seattle in November after carrying a pistol into a community center and being asked to leave. In March, a federal judge in Seattle ruled against Warden, finding the city was within its rights to restrict guns in "sensitive" areas such as schools and courthouses.

        Warden, a Kent attorney, initially appealed that ruling, but withdrew his appeal Thursday. In a statement, Warden said other lawsuits around the country are well positioned to resolve the question of what sorts of firearms restrictions cities can enact in sensitive areas.

        In any event, Seattle's gun ban won't be enforced while the city appeals a February ruling by a King County Superior Court judge, who found the gun ban violated state law. Cities and towns cannot impose their own firearms restrictions because that's up to the state Legislature, the judge ruled.

        Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn has vowed to continue fighting to uphold the ban, which was enacted last year by the previous mayor, Greg Nickels.
        The bolded part is the part I like...
        ..

        .........STGC(SW)


        SAF Life Member

        sigpic
        NRA Benefactor

        Comment

        • #5
          Gray Peterson
          Calguns Addict
          • Jan 2005
          • 5817

          Originally posted by hill billy
          http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...bancase03.html

          Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.
          Bob Warden and I massively tangled over this issue last November on OpenCarry.org's forums when he announced that the state plaintiffs (of which I was one of them) did not have standing because of what happened from Parker to Heller (applying DC's difficult Navegar standard to state court actions which are not applicable, and shortly thereafter, what did the city of Seattle do? Attack our standing, of course). He essentially publicly declared that SAF was doing it wrong because we were not following the Heller path of applying for something or being kicked out.

          As a result of the continual standing attacks by Bob and concerns about this, decided to get booted out Seattle parks facilities (Ray Carter by far wins for the most interesting method of getting booted). I, however, refused to cooperate with it, even if it meant that I was tossed out as a plaintiff by the judge for lack of standing. As many of the folks here can attest, I am a stubborn son of a *****.

          In the end, Superior Court Judge Schaefer stated that I had standing. I won that argument (the Seattle is still attacking our standing in the appellate court, saying that we "made up our standing").

          Comment

          • #6
            HondaMasterTech
            Veteran Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 4338

            Originally posted by hill billy
            http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...bancase03.html

            Seattle gun ban lawsuit dropped in favor of the other lawsuits in place that have a better chance. Finally, someone who understands that the whole is more important than the parts.
            I agree, there is no part better than the hole.
            Originally posted by Paladin
            (Please skip the lame "two weeks" replies.)
            Originally posted by Ford8N
            If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. Senator Dianne Feinstein, CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995

            Comment

            • #7
              MikeR
              Veteran Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 2573

              Originally posted by HondaMasterTech
              I agree, there is no part better than the hole.
              Sorry butt ROFL

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1