Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What is the NRA stance on this?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cybordolphin
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 41

    What is the NRA stance on this?

    What is the NRA saying about the BB AR's being sold to Californians, or do they have anything to say about it? Are they showing any support for them (the AR's) being sold in California?

    CalGuns seems to be more active regarding our rights surrounding the AR here in California than the NRA..... is that the case?

    Your thoughts...
  • #2
    hoffmang
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2006
    • 18448

    Originally posted by cybordolphin
    What is the NRA saying about the BB AR's being sold to Californians, or do they have anything to say about it? Are they showing any support for them (the AR's) being sold in California?

    CalGuns seems to be more active regarding our rights surrounding the AR here in California than the NRA..... is that the case?

    Your thoughts...
    NRA has been hugely helpful in the BB fight. AB-2728 was their handy work in concert with CGN (and back then - soon to be CGF.)

    -Gene
    Gene Hoffman
    Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

    DONATE NOW
    to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
    Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
    I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


    "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

    Comment

    • #3
      bwiese
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Oct 2005
      • 27621

      Not only our California NRA boys, but also NRA's CA legal team of Chuck Michel with able assistance of Jason Davis.

      AB2728 was a real rabbit-out-of-hat and will have consequences in the future as well.

      Team effort!

      Bill Wiese
      San Jose, CA

      CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
      sigpic
      No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
      to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
      ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
      employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
      legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

      Comment

      • #4
        ETD1010
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2006
        • 1298

        Originally posted by bwiese

        AB2728 was a real rabbit-out-of-hat and will have consequences in the future as well.

        Team effort!
        Consequences, I presume, that will be beneficial to us?

        Comment

        • #5
          cybordolphin
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 41

          Awsome! (Californiajective)

          Comment

          • #6
            hoffmang
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Apr 2006
            • 18448

            Originally posted by ETD1010
            Consequences, I presume, that will be beneficial to us?
            AB-2728 ended the DOJ's ability to add new firearms to the AW list and added a new optional lower penalty for simple possession of an AW. Both items are very good for us moving forward.

            -Gene
            Gene Hoffman
            Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

            DONATE NOW
            to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
            Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
            I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


            "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1