Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Activist judges

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    BoxesOfLiberty
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 336

    Originally posted by Glock22Fan
    "Well-read academics, being necessary for the proper teaching of English, the public shall have the right to own and read books without infringement"
    Nicely said.
    Dennis Murray

    Originally posted by EdHowdershelt
    There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    Comment

    • #17
      andalusi
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 421

      Originally posted by EOD3
      Has anyone at CGF given any thought to publishing a list of activist judges? I would like to know which judges rule by personal opinion rather than the law and/or Constitution. Supporting the right judges, chatting with friends and relatives or signage in the yard or whatever could go a long way toward government "by the people".

      IMHO: Most judges are elected based on the order of the candidates on the ballot, not their record, political affiliation, or views on personal liberty.
      Given that "activist judge" is a right-leaning side of the spectrum term for "judge who doesn't rule the way I want," I'd say that list would be rather subjective and differ from person to person.

      Comment

      • #18
        a1c
        CGSSA Coordinator
        • Oct 2009
        • 9098

        The Constitution requires some level of interpretation. And that's a judge's role. That's why we have a US Supreme Court.

        There are plenty of people - including people on the same general side of the political spectrum - who don't always agree on what the Constitution says or protects.

        The concept of "activist judge" was invented by people who didn't like the way a judge ruled. That's all.

        If CGF were to make such a list, they'd never get my money again.
        WTB: French & Finnish firearms. WTS: raw honey, tumbled .45 ACP brass, stupid cat.

        Comment

        • #19
          IWc
          Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 170

          Originally posted by EOD3
          Has anyone at CGF given any thought to publishing a list of activist judges? I would like to know which judges rule by personal opinion rather than the law and/or Constitution. Supporting the right judges, chatting with friends and relatives or signage in the yard or whatever could go a long way toward government "by the people".

          IMHO: Most judges are elected based on the order of the candidates on the ballot, not their record, political affiliation, or views on personal liberty.
          Originally posted by Mikeb
          OK How should I vote for judges? I try to be informed but when it comes to judges they are just names on the ballot, pick two...
          thanks
          Mike
          Simple, look for the fine print of endorses from any law enforcement, DA and etc.

          My elected DA wasn't endorsed from them.

          Comment

          • #20
            wildhawker
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Nov 2008
            • 14150

            I sometimes find myself in conflict with Orin Kerr's arguments, but recently he's made a few very salient points about perspective.

            That is to say, "brilliant people agree with me".

            Also, "people who disagree with me are just arguing in bad faith".

            Lastly, "stay true to the Constitution".
            Brandon Combs

            I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

            My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

            Comment

            • #21
              formula502
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2007
              • 85

              Originally posted by EOD3
              I would like to know which judges rule by personal opinion rather than the law and/or Constitution.
              I believe what everyone is trying to get at is that role of the judiciary (especially the appellate) is to INTERPRET the law. This is where we get into human beings acting like human beings.

              It's also why we have opinions issued along with rulings.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1