This thread will be for asking questions of Sac Sheriff Candidate Bret Daniels. I see he is a member here at calguns.net and is not shy to post. So let's ask him questions. Hopefully he can find time in what I'm sure is a very busy schedule to answer any questions we may have.
.
Firstly let me state that I'm just starting to bone up on the Candidates so forgive me, and others, if we are not fully informed on your stances. That is the aim of this thread.
My Question:
What specifics can you tell me about the reason you were fired as a deputy?
I heard this mentioned on a KTKZ radio show. Jim Cooper(for the record; Can't stand him) said something to the effect of, 'You were running names' I believe on a database and that it was a felony. Can you please elaborate on this issue for me or direct me to more info on the subject that may explain it?
Also forgive me for bringing it up AGAIN, but I could care less whether or not you are as fancy with your wording as other candidates. So far I love where you stand on issues of public safety(putting more officers in cars and not at desks) and personal protection(shall issue CCW; personal protection is sufficient cause).
.
Firstly let me state that I'm just starting to bone up on the Candidates so forgive me, and others, if we are not fully informed on your stances. That is the aim of this thread.
My Question:
What specifics can you tell me about the reason you were fired as a deputy?
I heard this mentioned on a KTKZ radio show. Jim Cooper(for the record; Can't stand him) said something to the effect of, 'You were running names' I believe on a database and that it was a felony. Can you please elaborate on this issue for me or direct me to more info on the subject that may explain it?
Also forgive me for bringing it up AGAIN, but I could care less whether or not you are as fancy with your wording as other candidates. So far I love where you stand on issues of public safety(putting more officers in cars and not at desks) and personal protection(shall issue CCW; personal protection is sufficient cause).
Comment