Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

- SCOTUS - Incorporation of 2nd A ...What Can We Expect Moving Forward?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ding126
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 4392

    - SCOTUS - Incorporation of 2nd A ...What Can We Expect Moving Forward?

    I am so anxious to hear their ruling. I hope there aren't any surprises. What do you think is Best Case & Worst Case we can expect?
    Last edited by Ding126; 06-28-2010, 7:55 AM.
    sigpic
  • #2
    Shotgun Man
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2007
    • 4053

    Yeah, me too. I expect a positive ruling that 2A is incorporated against the states and Chicago's ban is unconstitutional.

    I don't know whether SCOTUS will flat-out state the level of scrutiny.

    What really intrigues me is what will follow with the CA lawsuits on hold (Pena, Nordyke, etc.)
    Last edited by Shotgun Man; 04-27-2010, 7:44 PM.

    Comment

    • #3
      Dr.Lou
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 775

      Fingers crossed...
      sigpic
      NRA Benefactor Member

      Comment

      • #4
        GoodEyeSniper
        Senior Member
        • May 2009
        • 812

        My pessimistic view on what will happen.

        They grant incorporation, with very little specifics in regards to scope. They'll say a few things about "reasonable regulations" or whatever the new hot word for anti-2A laws are.

        It will be a definite step in the right direction for us, but a smaller step than we'd hope. The antis will say "but, but REASONABLE REGULATIONS" etc... and keep pushing for AW bans (which won't go anywhere), and open carry bans, etc... and it will be past the end of the Mayan calendar before California sees anything remotely like Shall Issue, or getting rid of our AW Ban.

        But, I'm also trying not to get my hopes up. And admittedly know less than most that post here :P

        Comment

        • #5
          2009_gunner
          Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 478

          Another important case that should be released any day, is Palmer v DC. CCW in the nation's capital - that should be worth a few editorials.
          sigpicNRA Member / CRPA Member / SAF Member / San Diego CCW Sponsor

          Comment

          • #6
            KWA-S
            Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 281

            Originally posted by GoodEyeSniper
            and it will be past the end of the Mayan calendar before California sees anything remotely like Shall Issue, or getting rid of our AW Ban.
            That IS only two years away. How long has Nordyke been thrown around?

            Comment

            • #7
              Cobrafreak
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 1335

              If we lose SCOTUS we may as well move to AZ. It's the most important ruling on our gun right we will ever see in our lifetime. Fingers crossed.

              Comment

              • #8
                Blackhawk556
                Veteran Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 4182

                i hope this really goes our way. this will be the longest 60days ever
                sigpic PM 4 Front Sight diamond
                "If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

                Comment

                • #9
                  tombinghamthegreat
                  Veteran Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 2785

                  Just wrote two papers for my upper division political science class about Heller and the upcoming McDonald ruling. Got a B+...only got marked down for lack of proofreading(wrote the report at the last minute, didn't proof read)
                  "Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense." Ron Paul
                  "The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." - Thomas Jefferson
                  Originally posted by forumguy
                  The same way they enforce all the rest of the BS laws. Only criminals are exempt, while the honest obey.
                  Originally posted by bwiese
                  Sometimes I think the function of Calguns is half to refute bad info from gunshops and half to refute bad info from DOJ.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Shotgun Man
                    Veteran Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 4053

                    Originally posted by tombinghamthegreat
                    Just wrote two papers for my upper division political science class about Heller and the upcoming McDonald ruling. Got a B+...only got marked down for lack of proofreading(wrote the report at the last minute, didn't proof read)
                    Might you post it?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      press1280
                      Veteran Member
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 3023

                      Originally posted by Ding126
                      I am so anxious to hear their ruling. I hope there aren't any surprises. What do you think is Best Case & Worst Case we can expect?
                      Realistic best case is "full" incorporation,meaning none of this stuff suggested by Stevens that the states will have a watered down 2A. Also, a standard of scrutiny and maybe another look at the full meaning of the 2A, suggesting carry rights outside the home. A stronger than 5-4 split would also help.

                      Worst case is obviously a loss on incorporation, but that's very unlikely IMO. Otherwise, incorporation with a vague opinion on standards and the 2A meaning will ensure many more trips to the high courts for our victories.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        press1280
                        Veteran Member
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 3023

                        Originally posted by 2009_gunner
                        Another important case that should be released any day, is Palmer v DC. CCW in the nation's capital - that should be worth a few editorials.
                        The more time Palmer drags on the more I get the feeling that the judge is waiting for McDonald to come out(even though they're not the same issues). It sucks some judges may not feel like doing their own research and analysis and wait for higher courts to make decisions for them.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          ZombieTactics
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 3691

                          We're going to get incorporation with intermediate scrutiny.

                          States like CA will try all sorts of crap with "reasonable restrictions", and probably push the limits of intermediate scrutiny.

                          Court case will abound ... many of which will eventually end up at SCOTUS again. The pessimist in me fears that our current POTUS will eventually end up with the death or resignation of one of the more conservative-leaning justices ... and will appoint some idiot like Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton or Janet Napolitano.

                          The fight is never over ... eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.
                          |
                          sigpic
                          I don't pretend to be an "authority." I'm just a guy who trains a lot, shoots a lot and has a perspective.

                          Check the ZombieTactics Channel on YouTube for all sorts of gun-related goodness CLICK HERE

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            tiki
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 1441

                            Originally posted by press1280
                            It sucks some judges may not feel like doing their own research and analysis and wait for higher courts to make decisions for them.
                            I prefer it that way. It seems that when these lower court judges make their own decisions, they wind up going to the higher courts anyway. I would rather Palmer wait for McDonald, then have them make the right decision. Otherwise, Palmer has to go back to court after McDonald if Palmer conflicts with McDonald.
                            "The problem with quotes found on the Internet is you have no way of confirming their authenticity."
                            -Abraham Lincoln

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Legasat
                              Intergalactic Member
                              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 4151

                              I'm pretty confident (from reading), that we will get the basic right incorporated. My biggest fear is how much latitude will Scotus give the States to erect "reasonable restrictions". I think it is possible to win the case, and still not gain much ground.

                              Keeping finger crossed.
                              ..

                              .........STGC(SW)


                              SAF Life Member

                              sigpic
                              NRA Benefactor

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1