OC Sheriff Sandra Hutchens documented history of financial irresponsibility

[RomanDad]

Any new developments?

Sheriff Hutchens and her campaign have been uncharacteristically quiet on this issue... Some might say the silence is deafening.

[RomanDad]

We just got some new information on this that will be going up very soon.


In the meantime, we need ALL OF YOU, EVERYBODY to link this to every internet forum you go to... All of that helps with the google page ranking so that when you google her name, THIS IS THE FIRST STORY PEOPLE SEE.

Email the press, Board of Supervisors, your friends, whoever.... WE CANNOT LET THEM IGNORE THIS ISSUE.

This is about getting rid of her.

[Doheny]

In the meantime, we need ALL OF YOU, EVERYBODY to link this to every internet forum you go to...

You mean this specific thread, or what?

[1BigPea]

Nice.

Tagged for more info...

[RomanDad]

For those who are subscribed to this thread- Here you go.

http://www.occcws.com/?p=896

A recent forum for candidates seeking election to the office of Sheriff of Orange County provided some very telling words from Sandra Hutchens.

In the first video clip, which contains audio recorded at the event, Sandra Hutchens responds to a question as to whether she should be held to the same standard as an applicant to be a deputy sheriff when it comes to revealing significant personal financial details. The puzzled reactions of those in attendance is unmistakable. For reference, see the relevant pages (Here, and Here) of the Personal History Statement applicants to become peace officers must complete FULLY and TRUTHFULLY. Did Sandra Hutchens hold herself to that same standard when she applied to be appointed Sheriff?

In the second clip, which contains audio recorded at the event and images of previously released public documents, Sandra Hutchens responds to a very clear question. We assume that the Sheriff of Orange County would not dodge the question, as she has placed such a premium on transparency and integrity, so we must take her at her word that she never told the Board of Supervisors about her secret history of foreclosure and its related lawsuit, not to mention the tax liens and restraining order stemming from defaulting on an $800,000 mortgage.