Gene:
I hear you on this issue, and see your point. I do believe Scalia is a Constitutionalist who would follow most of the others, and believe it or not, so is Ruth Bader Ginsberg. On most part, especially in recent years, the court has been deeply divided on certain issues and cases. But on Constitutional Issues, especially the ones that make up the Bill of Rights? Not a CHANCE!! What I'm trying to say is that no one wants to challenge a issue like the 2nd Amendment because no one wants to second guess or rule against what our founding fathers were thinking and put down on paper. It's that simple.
As far as the court to hear and rule on a 2nd Amendment issue, it might be time for the court to hear this case and put this issue to rest. But then what would happen is states, like the PRK, would scream state rights and the issue would be inflamed again. I believe SCOTUS is trying to avoid this quagmire and future reprocussions.
Comment