If I lived in town, I would not think of carrying a gun outside to confront a drunk or a thief. Belongings can be replaced cheaper than it would cost for an attorney to defend you. Now, living in a remote area, if I go outside to investigate any problem, you better believe that I'm going to take whatever precautions I feel nessassary to provide for the safety of me and my family. Hell, if I ever had to call the SD, I doubt they could be there in less than 30 minutes.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
2:15am my wife wakes me up and says, "Get your gun"...
Collapse
X
-
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor
California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller
Ventura County approved CCW Instructor
Utah CCW Instructor
Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners.
sigpic CCW SAFE MEMBERSHIPS HERE
KM6WLV -
Personally, I think this is your best bet if you're dead set on confronting the guy (not just yelling at them from inside your house):
1. Confront, but DO NOT show them you have a weapon (but be ready to draw it if you need to). Hopefully, they run away when someone actually goes out and confronts them.
2. If they run, great. If they don't and start coming at you in a threatening manner (and you feel that you're now at risk), THEN pull the gun.
What you want to avoid is getting in the shootout with the guy and allowing them to claim that they were just defending themselves because they saw that you had a gun and thought you were going to shoot. You have to be careful of this. The fact that this happens outside (probably considered in public even if on private property) and that you were not initially threatened will not help your cause. Remember, deadly force is not acceptable to defend property.Everyone opposes judicial legislation until the judiciary legislates in their favor.Comment
-
You can use deadly force to effect a citizen's arrest when the perpetrator escalates it to that, even for property crimes.
Use a gun to effect the arrest, bad guy charges you with a screw driver, good shoot.
Use a gun to effect the arrest, bad guy does nothing, you approach in an attempt to detain and he fights you, it escalates to the point to warrant deadly force, good shoot.
The fact that it is for property is irrelevant.Everyone opposes judicial legislation until the judiciary legislates in their favor.Comment
-
The only advice I'd take is to buy this book on CA self defense case law (also covers possession, purchasing guns etc....) It's written in plain English :http://gunlawpress.com/
NO gun or knife carrier (even if only at home) should be without it's council.
Spending $15 now is better than any of the alternatives.False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/Comment
-
My father works for a PD in the bay area...He would always say to make sure their in the house before you shoot...not in the yard, back door etc. I'm sure they're are many variables to his information.Last edited by Ding126; 11-29-2009, 2:13 PM.sigpicComment
-
I've found a garden hose to be quite useful at dealing with stupid teens during the witching hour.....they seem to be afraid of the water.Originally posted by Daytripper63"Looking a bit angry, he asked why I thought it was a Republican truck. I explained that if it were an Obama truck, the seats would blow smoke up your *** year-round. I had to walk back to the dealership. The guy had no sense of humor."Comment
-
You can use deadly force to effect a citizen's arrest when the perpetrator escalates it to that, even for property crimes.
Use a gun to effect the arrest, bad guy charges you with a screw driver, good shoot.
It is no longer a property crime at this point, it is a crime of violence
Use a gun to effect the arrest, bad guy does nothing, you approach in an attempt to detain and he fights you, it escalates to the point to warrant deadly force, good shoot.
No longer a property crime at this point.
The fact that it is for property is irrelevant.
Wrong! As long as it is merely a property crime, deadly force is not appropriate and will land you in jail.
I'm giving my opinion based on 31 years of LE experience and have personally handled over a hundred situations where homeowners were forced to arm themselves. The results were a very broad spectrum, each judged on its own merits. Most had positive outcomes.
FYI, Cops like it when bad guys lose and the good guy comes out on top. Just make sure what you are doing is reasonable for the situation.
As far as we are concerned, you get brownie points in heaven for taking out a bad guy.LASD Retired
1978-2011
NRA Life Member
CRPA Life Member
NRA Rifle Instructor
NRA Shotgun Instructor
NRA Range Safety Officer
DOJ Certified InstructorComment
-
12031 (k) Nothing in this section is intended to preclude the carrying
of a loaded firearm by any person while engaged in the act of making
or attempting to make a lawful arrest.
417. (a) (1) Every person who, except in self-defense, in the
presence of any other person, draws or exhibits any deadly weapon
whatsoever, other than a firearm, in a rude, angry, or threatening
manner, or who in any manner, unlawfully uses a deadly weapon other
than a firearm in any fight or quarrel is guilty of a misdemeanor,
punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not less than 30
days.
(2) Every person who, except in self-defense, in the presence of
any other person, draws or exhibits any firearm, whether loaded or
unloaded, in a rude, angry, or threatening manner, or who in any
manner, unlawfully uses a firearm in any fight or quarrel is
punishable as follows:Last edited by Liberty1; 11-28-2009, 10:51 AM.False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/Comment
-
If I lived in town, I would not think of carrying a gun outside to confront a drunk or a thief. Belongings can be replaced cheaper than it would cost for an attorney to defend you. Now, living in a remote area, if I go outside to investigate any problem, you better believe that I'm going to take whatever precautions I feel nessassary to provide for the safety of me and my family. Hell, if I ever had to call the SD, I doubt they could be there in less than 30 minutes.
Did I have the means to affect a citizens arrest? Yes. Do I have the level of skill and training to use a firearm (and weapon light or flashlight) in the middle of the night, just awakened, under condition red stress, against an unknown number of perpetrators who's skills, weapons, and tactics are unknown. BIG maybe!
The biggest problem I see here, besides risking my own a**, is where are my misses going to end up? A shotgun slug will go through about nine walls. not to mention that they will bounce and tumble (and kill) for several hundred yards if unimpeded. Buck shot can go through several walls depending on proximity. Pistol calibers go through several walls.
So now I am not just risking my a**, but all of my sleeping neighbors, their children, their property, etc. I'll most likely get shredded in court, if I don't get shot by the bad guys or the cops arriving on the scene, or another neighbor thinking I'm one of the bad guys.
Oh yeah, my neighbor has insurance on his home and cars, and so do I, so what the heck am I doing out here in the dark, in my underwear with my shotgun? Trying to be a stop-loss field claims negotiator for Allstate! LOL!
Call 911, be a good witness, stay on with dispatcher, be invisible to the bad guys. Best to be the eyes and ears - not a hero.
If the fight comes to you, or if it's a life threatening violent crime against another person, that's entirely different.
.Last edited by Serpentine; 11-28-2009, 11:16 AM.Comment
-
I don't know...I don't think I would used an untested firearm in a situation like this. I would have grabbed whatever has been most reliable first.Comment
-
Reading this thread reminds one that here in California, the right to keep and bear arms has been infringed so much that people are afraid to exercise that right. Incorporation will not come soon enough.
-JasonLooking for photos for your wall?
Help feed my children by clicking here.Comment
-
-
I don't think it's a CA problem. In MANY jurisdictions, you can't claim self defense to defending property. The problem isn't I'm afraid to defend myself with my gun, I'm sure close to none of us would hesitate to do that. The problem is I'm afraid to defend my car with my gun.Everyone opposes judicial legislation until the judiciary legislates in their favor.Comment
-
Maybe that's the problem... Too many people are thinking solely that using force is only in terms of self defense. E Pluribus Unum and Liberty1 have already outlined methods of lawful citizen's arrest and detaining a suspect in the commission of a crime.
I don't think it's a CA problem. In MANY jurisdictions, you can't claim self defense to defending property. The problem isn't I'm afraid to defend myself with my gun, I'm sure close to none of us would hesitate to do that. The problem is I'm afraid to defend my car with my gun.Orange County OC'er.
"Lead by example!"
"Gun Control isn't about guns. It's about Control." - ?Comment
-
And, to be perfectly honest, I'd use it as self defense under VERY few circumstances. I may use a citizen's arrest at some point, but that probably won't be on the car thief. If I wanted to arrest people for a living, I'd be a cop. For me, a gun is for self defense or as a hobby, not for me to play cops n robbers.Everyone opposes judicial legislation until the judiciary legislates in their favor.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,318
Posts: 25,005,807
Members: 353,847
Active Members: 5,830
Welcome to our newest member, RhythmInTheMeat.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 9533 users online. 194 members and 9339 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment