Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Anybody planning on running for office in 2010?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigtoe416
    Junior Member
    • May 2008
    • 81

    Anybody planning on running for office in 2010?

    I'm considering running against my state assemblyman Ammiano. I'm to the point where if I can't make any change in this state then I'm going to leave. Figure I owe it to California to try to save itself since I've lived here my entire life.

    Is anybody else thinking or planning on running for any office? If not, how come? If you are, I'd highly recommend registering to vote now in the party you want to run as. I think you need to have belonged to your party for 3 months before your declaration of candidacy is submitted, which is in March.

    Here is the calendar of deadlines for 2010 elections: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2010...-key-dates.htm
  • #2
    oldrifle
    Triple Unobtainium Member
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Oct 2007
    • 4716

    I was thinking about it but I'm not really sure if I have the stomach for politics.
    -- Proud Donor. Please join me in donating now to help protect our 2nd amendment rights.

    Buy from Amazon? Use this link to shop and earn money for CGF at the same time!

    Comment

    • #3
      bwiese
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Oct 2005
      • 27621

      Originally posted by bigtoe416
      I'm considering running against my state assemblyman Ammiano. I'm to the point where if I can't make any change in this state then I'm going to leave. Figure I owe it to California to try to save itself since I've lived here my entire life.
      Please save your money & time.

      You don't have a chance.

      Bill Wiese
      San Jose, CA

      CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
      sigpic
      No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
      to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
      ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
      employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
      legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

      Comment

      • #4
        Untamed1972
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Mar 2009
        • 17579

        I was thinking more along the lines of running FROM the office
        "Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

        Quote for the day:
        "..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun

        Comment

        • #5
          nicki
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 4208

          Running for office.

          The districts are set so that they are either solidly Republican or solidly Democrat. There are only a few "swing districts".

          The reality is picking off a incumbent will be extremely difficult unless that incumbent does something to piss off huge numbers of the voters.

          People don't like change unless the current politicians are so bad that they scream for it. McCain lost the election because basically many people percieved he would be another term of BUSH.

          Obama won because the perception was that he would change things, that he would get us out of Iraq, that he would bring peace and prosperity.

          As someone who was involved in "guerilla political campaigns" in the early 90's, it is not that difficult to get onto the ballot, but then the question becomes, what next.

          The one thing we have going for us here in California is that we have term limits, that means one third of the legislature and one fourth of the state senate changes every election cycle.

          We will need to find or develop our candidates for primaries in both the Democrat and Republican primaries because if we are to get into state politics, this is the model we need to develop.

          The reality is usually the people who are running for Assembly and Senate offices usually have already held other office, like city councils, county board of supervisors, mayors etc.

          That means long term, we have to look at the people who run for local office.

          Of course we can run candidates to bleed resources or to make statements and there may be some merit in doing that, but these actions would have to be weighed in on a case by case basis.

          Politicians don't like to ruffle feathers, many politicians who vote anti gun do so because when a bill sits in front of them, they have to do something.

          The leaders on gun legislation, both pro and anti are few.

          It is great you want to do something, so I suggest to you or anyone else reading this post that you honestly look at what your results would be and if you feel that the end results would justify the use of resources, go for it.

          Nicki

          Comment

          • #6
            bigtoe416
            Junior Member
            • May 2008
            • 81

            Calguns has what, 30k members?

            How many of us want things to be different in this state? All of us.
            How many have ran for office? To my knowledge, nobody.

            Why not? Because we'll lose? Fine, lets say we get 100 people running for state positions in all various districts, and we go out there and we talk to people about all of our rights and how the state is going broke and how things don't have to be this way. People go out and vote and we all lose.

            What change have we made if we all failed? We've brought up the issues we feel are important to people who normally wouldn't think of them. We've planted a seed of thought that may grow into something more. A bunch of people will start caring more about their rights and how ridiculous our state government is. It's still a net positive.

            Lets say one person out of the 100 wins. Amazing! Now we have a man (or woman) on the inside who can disrupt business as usual. We'll have a person who can stand up during a debate on rights issues and speak our position loudly and clearly. Maybe he can sway a few legislators to not vote for bad bills. Maybe his arguments will be heard by thousands of people, which will get even more people to think about their lost rights. Those people may end up becoming more active in these civil rights issues.

            Even if everybody loses, maybe the legislature will open their eyes when the numbers of people running against them has skyrocketed. Maybe they'll start to listen to the thousands of people who call in to oppose AB962. Maybe they'll stop ignoring bills like AB357. Maybe we won't have to wait ten years to get something close to 'shall issue.'

            I'm not suggesting that if I run that I will win, or that any of us will. I'm just suggesting that if we're not happy with our government, then why should we sit around and vote for these guys who are screwing us?

            Lets stop looking for leaders and start looking at ourselves. At best, we take over our state and save it from its coming demise. At worst we end up talking about our various lost civil rights to people who didn't care about that before.

            Comment

            • #7
              Doug L
              Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 176

              Originally posted by bigtoe416
              I'm considering running against my state assemblyman Ammiano. I'm to the point where if I can't make any change in this state then I'm going to leave.
              2008 general election results for the 13th. assembly district were:

              Tom Ammiano...............DEM...........162,977.....83 .4%
              Harmeet K.Dhillon..........REP.............32,552.....16.6 %

              Assuming you'd run as a Republican, then, needless to say, you'd have an uphill fight.

              But...if you think you'd have a better chance, and if you like a challenge, and have a bunch of money available...go for it!

              To the detriment of California, the corrupt politicans (both parties) have gerrymandered all of the distrists to guarantee their own re-elections.

              Originally posted by bigtoe416
              Figure I owe it to California to try to save itself since I've lived here my entire life.
              I admire your positive attitude.

              Originally posted by bigtoe416
              Is anybody else thinking or planning on running for any office?.
              Based upon the results of the 2008 election, these are the districts where it should be easiest to defeat the incumbent Democrat.

              10th Assembly District

              Alyson L. Huber.........DEM......46.7%
              Jack Sieglock............REP.......46.4%
              Janice M. Bonser........LIB.........6.9%

              Counties: Amador, El Dorado, Sacramento, San Joaquin

              15th Assembly District
              Joan Buchanan.........DEM.......52.3%
              Abram Wilson............REP.......47.7%

              Counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin

              80th Assembly District

              Manuel Perez..........DEM........52.7%
              Gary Jeandron.........REP.........47.3%

              Counties: Imperial, Riverside
              I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of itThere are lots of bad Republicans. There are no good Democrats." - Ann Coulter

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1