Report: Turner's visit with Gov re veto of AB962/SB585/SB41

[Greg-Dawg]

I just got a spam mail from Turners regarding the two bills this morning.

So I had a long conversation with Bill Ortiz from Turner's...

What do you do again?

[pmrtruck]

Please ignore Turner's on matters regarding SB41 - the NRA has requested no comment/actions.
From a practical standpoint SB41 is trivial.

2)Updates various statutes to reflect the name change of the
California National Guard Military Museum and Resource Center
to the State Military Museum and Resource Center.

This is not trivial. This is a direct attack against the existence of an autonomous state of California which resides and makes it's own decisions inside the great United States of America. This is at the very least dishonorable and disrespectful. I am surprised the men/women in the California National Guard are not a wee bit pissed at this one.

meaning there is probably follow-up positive legislation planned that builds upon SB41.

Using one bad law to off-set another, no matter how erroneous the original law is never good. Two wrongs never made a right.
and
You are assuming ahead of time something GOOD will come from the passage of this bill?
HUH?
(see above)

I will pull my BS card. This is nothing more than a separation of the inherent rights of Californians to maintain a history and a definitly, whether you agree or not, open minded governance. We will handle our own. We are proud of our California National Guard. (Let this pass, the Federal Brown Shirt memorial may come to existence next...)

Just finished an email to Gov.

[wildhawker]

No have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

2)Updates various statutes to reflect the name change of the
California National Guard Military Museum and Resource Center
to the State Military Museum and Resource Center.

This is not trivial. This is a direct attack against the existence of an autonomous state of California which resides and makes it's own decisions inside the great United States of America. This is at the very least dishonorable and disrespectful. I am surprised the men/women in the California National Guard are not a wee bit pissed at this one.



Using one bad law to off-set another, no matter how erroneous the original law is never good. Two wrongs never made a right.
and
You are assuming ahead of time something GOOD will come from the passage of this bill?
HUH?
(see above)

I will pull my BS card. This is nothing more than a separation of the inherent rights of Californians to maintain a history and a definitly, whether you agree or not, open minded governance. We will handle our own. We are proud of our California National Guard. (Let this pass, the Federal Brown Shirt memorial may come to existence next...)

[7x57]

meaning there is probably follow-up positive legislation planned that builds upon SB41.

Knowing the source, it's certain to fall into one of two categories:

1) maximizing expected gain.
2) minimizing expected loss.

Nothing public says which, but it's one of those and whichever it is, it would behove us to pay attention. I just don't want you to bank on #1 and expect something good out of it if it turns out to be #2 and the benefit is avoiding something worse.

Unfortunately, that's realpolitik for you. Fortunately, we have ninjas on the job in Sacramento.

7x57

[mmartin]

I just got a spam mail from Turners regarding the two bills this morning.

Originally Posted by mmartin
So I had a long conversation with Bill Ortiz from Turner's...

What do you do again?

I'm an Engineer mostly working on medical life support equipment and ICU/medical test equipment, I design it, test it and help get it through the FDA. and I teach belly dancing.

Megan

[artherd]

Good work Megan!

[forgiven]

Thanks Megan.