Dear Senator / Governor,
I am writing to you as a concerned California citizen, in opposition to bill AB962.
This bill, if passed:
(a) WILL NOT reduce criminal gun violence and/or crimes
(b) INCREASES TAXES
(c) NEGATIVELY affects revenue in a State that is struggling to survive this recession.
(d) has NO ACCOUNTABILITY built in to the bill to measure success or failure metrics
A. This bill intends to reduce gun violence by reducing the amount of ammunition criminals can purchase. It allows for private transfer of only 50 rounds between individuals. No long argument here. 99.999% of all gun crimes/violent acts involve less than 50 rounds of ammunition. If you have an ounce of grey matter between your ears, you realize that criminals will still easily have access to the ammunition they need for their crimes, and if they are committing criminal acts, they will not care about the 50 round limit. This bill FAILS in denying access to ammunition by criminals.
B. The first version of this bill grossly underestimated the costs needed to fund all the background checks and finger printing required by the bill. The author quickly slipped in an amendment which increases taxes on ammunition to pay for these new activities. These taxes are passed on to sportsmen across the state who participate in shooting matches at public and private clubs. This is an unfair tax passed on to sportsmen such as myself, for a bill that won't even accomplish what it tasks out to do.
C. Ammunition sales will decrease if this bill passes. State income tax revenue from those sales will decrease as well. Shooting ranges, sporting events involving pistols will decrease. This bill affects law abiding Californians across the state who make their living in these areas.
D. This pie in the sky "good idea" bill offers up a grandious solution to criminal gun violence. But it does not offer up any level of metrics and accountability to measure if it is succeeding or failing. Similar legislation was present in the 1960's and was repealed due to it being ineffective. This bill, even if it were to pass needs to publicly offer metrics, easily accessible to anyone, which summarizes ammunition sales across the state over time, and criminal gun violence across the state over time.
I urge you to vote against this bill. Whether you are anti or pro gun, it does not make a difference. This bill just fails before it starts. Please spend your valuable time working on a bill that will actually reduce crime, rather than a bill that just punishes sportsmen across the State.
Very truly yours,
<insert name here>
=============
Modify to make it yours, and send it on to all the Senators of the State, and our Governor.
Anyone willing to wordsmith this letter, I welcome your edits. Including factual information about previous legislation, or specific numbers with regards to revenue decrease and/or tax increase.
Let's make it easy for all members of this forum, (and other forums) to write good solid letters and help defeat this bill.
I am writing to you as a concerned California citizen, in opposition to bill AB962.
This bill, if passed:
(a) WILL NOT reduce criminal gun violence and/or crimes
(b) INCREASES TAXES
(c) NEGATIVELY affects revenue in a State that is struggling to survive this recession.
(d) has NO ACCOUNTABILITY built in to the bill to measure success or failure metrics
A. This bill intends to reduce gun violence by reducing the amount of ammunition criminals can purchase. It allows for private transfer of only 50 rounds between individuals. No long argument here. 99.999% of all gun crimes/violent acts involve less than 50 rounds of ammunition. If you have an ounce of grey matter between your ears, you realize that criminals will still easily have access to the ammunition they need for their crimes, and if they are committing criminal acts, they will not care about the 50 round limit. This bill FAILS in denying access to ammunition by criminals.
B. The first version of this bill grossly underestimated the costs needed to fund all the background checks and finger printing required by the bill. The author quickly slipped in an amendment which increases taxes on ammunition to pay for these new activities. These taxes are passed on to sportsmen across the state who participate in shooting matches at public and private clubs. This is an unfair tax passed on to sportsmen such as myself, for a bill that won't even accomplish what it tasks out to do.
C. Ammunition sales will decrease if this bill passes. State income tax revenue from those sales will decrease as well. Shooting ranges, sporting events involving pistols will decrease. This bill affects law abiding Californians across the state who make their living in these areas.
D. This pie in the sky "good idea" bill offers up a grandious solution to criminal gun violence. But it does not offer up any level of metrics and accountability to measure if it is succeeding or failing. Similar legislation was present in the 1960's and was repealed due to it being ineffective. This bill, even if it were to pass needs to publicly offer metrics, easily accessible to anyone, which summarizes ammunition sales across the state over time, and criminal gun violence across the state over time.
I urge you to vote against this bill. Whether you are anti or pro gun, it does not make a difference. This bill just fails before it starts. Please spend your valuable time working on a bill that will actually reduce crime, rather than a bill that just punishes sportsmen across the State.
Very truly yours,
<insert name here>
=============
Modify to make it yours, and send it on to all the Senators of the State, and our Governor.
Anyone willing to wordsmith this letter, I welcome your edits. Including factual information about previous legislation, or specific numbers with regards to revenue decrease and/or tax increase.
Let's make it easy for all members of this forum, (and other forums) to write good solid letters and help defeat this bill.
Comment