Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Boxer's 2010 re-election bid

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    berto
    Calguns Addict
    • Oct 2005
    • 7723

    Originally posted by greasemonkey
    My thoughts are that I'd rather put a true conservative up, have him lose once and deal with one more awful term under a progressive, then people are more likely to reconsider that anchored conservative/statist the next time around. Instead of having a flip-flopping 'republican' who bends over for anyone which rightfully leaves people with a horrendous likeness of what the RNC or even independents are supposedly all about, making them want to go back to another progressive borderline socialist.
    So far Boxer has been reelected twice. The let evil show herself so she can be defeated next time plan has yet to work. The plan relies on a deep bench with viable candidates emerging for the next election. The republican bench has been a graveyard for more than a decade. Boxer's margins keep growing. Same with DiFi.
    "There are no outdoor sports as graceful as throwing stones at a dictatorship." Ai WeiWei

    Comment

    • #77
      .454
      Banned
      • Jul 2008
      • 3839

      Boxer removed? When this State is becoming more and more liberal with every day passing and with every illegal immigrant jumping over the border fence? You ARE kidding, right?
      Bwhahahahaa!!!

      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate California

      Last edited by .454; 08-23-2009, 1:27 PM.

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1