Bruen v Cal Roster

[Tiberius]

OK, probably dumb question, but there's so much litigation going on.

Is there a case using Bruen to challenge the entire California handgun roster? The roster has no historical precedent for banning certain widely available firearms based on arbitrary features, and so the whole thing appears unconstitutional under the Bruen test. (There were no LCIs at the time of the founding) . . . .

I'm sure people far smarter than me have already tackled this, or figured out it doesn't work. After all, I'm just some guy on the internet.

[Librarian]

See the thread on Renna v Bonta, https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1665656

[Capybara]

Of course the roster is 100% Unconstitutional and against the Bruen ruling, that's what California loves doing, using the Constitution and our civil rights like so much toilet paper. That's never going to change. This state is doomed from a personal freedom standpoint.

[Djantlive]

This state needs to get worse before getting better. Deficit, crime, drug use, economy.

Unfortunately the public don?t support 2A. Firearm owners are hiding their possession. Others just blame the gun for failing policies.

Well, at least the roster has some new firearms added now. Not great but better than paying 2-3x through ppt

[AlmostHeaven]

As long as the education system and media environment in California continue to produce braindead carbon-copy progressives with exterior diversity of skin color but zero diversity of thought, the Second Amendment will always be under severe threat in the state.