OK, probably dumb question, but there's so much litigation going on.
Is there a case using Bruen to challenge the entire California handgun roster? The roster has no historical precedent for banning certain widely available firearms based on arbitrary features, and so the whole thing appears unconstitutional under the Bruen test. (There were no LCIs at the time of the founding) . . . .
I'm sure people far smarter than me have already tackled this, or figured out it doesn't work. After all, I'm just some guy on the internet.
Is there a case using Bruen to challenge the entire California handgun roster? The roster has no historical precedent for banning certain widely available firearms based on arbitrary features, and so the whole thing appears unconstitutional under the Bruen test. (There were no LCIs at the time of the founding) . . . .
I'm sure people far smarter than me have already tackled this, or figured out it doesn't work. After all, I'm just some guy on the internet.
Comment