Duplicate
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SB2 stay on hold 1/1/24 we will be criminals
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by AlmostHeaven; 12-31-2023, 6:00 AM.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights. -
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.Comment
-
Another reason I'm happy I have one more month in this state and then I'm leaving. The state goes to incredibly great lengths to take away rights of a segment of law-abiding citizens (CCW holders) that have no real history of violence, yet the state is going on the premises that if they don't push SB2 by January 1st there will be anarchy, chaos and blood on the streets. Well guess what, that's already the case, but it's not CCW holders causing this. I'm so disgusted and over this state. Just two days ago in Oakland we had an employee get beat up and robbed walking across the street of the hospital to the parking lot, and this isn't the first time it's happened. Drive by shootings right outside the hospital, going lockdown several times this year because of gunfire int he vicinity of the hospital, and the list goes on. Last time I checked it wasn't CCW holders responsible for these crimes and acts of violence.sigpicComment
-
I will follow the Supreme Court?s decision.
?We too agree and find consistent with Heller and McDonald, that the second and fourteenth amendments protects an individual to carry a handgun for self defense outside the home.?
And
?When confronted with an unconstitutional restriction of an enumerated inalienable right, you may exercise your right WITH IMPUNITY.?
I will continue to carry everywhere but those places that meet the Text History and Tradition of ?sensitive places?.
Anywhere public, without controlled entry and proper signage and I?ll be carrying. As states in Bruen I will not carry in government buildings, court houses, post offices, and other places referenced in Bruen on page 21 paragraph 2.10/15/2022 - Called to get on the list
2/18/2023 - Interview set
4/27/2023 - Class
4/30/2023 - Live Scan
5/9/2023 - Interview
6/26/2023 - Approval Letter
8/1/2023 - IssuedComment
-
So does this mean our CCW insurance will not cover us, if we are forced to engage a bad guy?Then said He unto them...
"and he that hath no 1911 designed by my servant John Moses Browning,
let him sell his garment and buy one."
And they said, "Lord, behold, here are two Glocks."
And He said unto them, "Meh, it's a good start."
Luke 22:36-38 (somewhat paraphrased)Comment
-
-
Since I am old and have only two brain cells left (and one of those is showing smoke) I am having to resort to printing out the list of prohibited places for reference when I leave my house.
Seriously, how in the hell are we supposed to remember all the 26 items on the list in order to not be in violation?
Basically, it comes down to two choices if you have a CCW...
1. Not carry and takes your chance that evil will not befall you.
2. Carry anyway and risk getting pinched.
I heard some guys at the coffee shop saying that every CCW holder in CA stage a mass 'civil disobedience' protest by carrying anyway.
Such a protest would overload LE and the courts to the point where SB2 would be pointless, and it would be repealed just as was done with Prohibition in the 1920's.
-P? "If you want nice fresh oats, you have to pay a fair price. If you are satisfied with oats that have already been through the horse, well, that comes a little cheaper."
Comment
-
SB2 stay on hold 1/1/24 we will be criminals
I called CCW Safe on Dec 27, 2923, and asked them if they cover incidents where I might have to use my firearm in a sensitive area. They said, "yes, you have coverage if you use you firearm to defend yourself or others in a sensitive space"
ETA: The competition for clients is extreme right now. The companies that provide coverage are likely going to be making regular upgrades in their policies to retain and attract clients.Last edited by JDoe; 12-31-2023, 9:40 AM.sigpicComment
-
That's still out of sight, out of mind as we are talking about CONCEALED carry.Since I am old and have only two brain cells left (and one of those is showing smoke) I am having to resort to printing out the list of prohibited places for reference when I leave my house.
Seriously, how in the hell are we supposed to remember all the 26 items on the list in order to not be in violation?
Basically, it comes down to two choices if you have a CCW...
1. Not carry and takes your chance that evil will not befall you.
2. Carry anyway and risk getting pinched.
I heard some guys at the coffee shop saying that every CCW holder in CA stage a mass 'civil disobedience' protest by carrying anyway.
Such a protest would overload LE and the courts to the point where SB2 would be pointless, and it would be repealed just as was done with Prohibition in the 1920's.
-P
We can do all the silent protest or civil disobedience we but we will be invisible and irrelevant to the discussion with large.My opinion on the CA Government:
Originally posted by Grover NorquistI don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.Comment
-
Called? If you have nothing more than a verbal on that, get it in writing. Email them, see how they reply.
That is the absolute must with any insurance company. Because if it ever comes up, they will strictly adhere to the policy, the contract you have with them. Read that first, see what it says, such as negating defense costs for criminal acts, then cite the actual problematic section of their policy in concern.
Never, never, never trust what they merely 'tell' you, because half the time the person you're speaking with does not even know what their own policy says, and the other half they will simply be unethical and lie, to tell you want you want to hear, just to get you off the phone to stop from making them work.
---Last edited by The Gleam; 12-31-2023, 9:57 AM.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
Insurance agent selling USCCA told me that USCCA is not a ccw insurance. It is a self defense insurance. It doesnt have to involve a firearm. Can be your fists or knife or whatever. The will spend money on your trial but if you are guilty the insurance stop immediately and will not pay for any bills after that, including already incurred expenses. So if you find yourself at trial, make sure your lawyer get paid right before the verdict or plead bargain.Comment
-
Yea, howd that work out for all the J6ers sitting in federal prison or on federal probation? LE will use every resource possible to identify everyone involved in one of those protests and prosecute the heck out of them just to make a point.Since I am old and have only two brain cells left (and one of those is showing smoke) I am having to resort to printing out the list of prohibited places for reference when I leave my house.
Seriously, how in the hell are we supposed to remember all the 26 items on the list in order to not be in violation?
Basically, it comes down to two choices if you have a CCW...
1. Not carry and takes your chance that evil will not befall you.
2. Carry anyway and risk getting pinched.
I heard some guys at the coffee shop saying that every CCW holder in CA stage a mass 'civil disobedience' protest by carrying anyway.
Such a protest would overload LE and the courts to the point where SB2 would be pointless, and it would be repealed just as was done with Prohibition in the 1920's.
-PComment
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,254
Posts: 25,029,568
Members: 354,385
Active Members: 6,348
Welcome to our newest member, JU83.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3064 users online. 157 members and 2907 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment