Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

I get LuCC but what about UL but not locked?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bubbapug1
    Calguns Addict
    • Nov 2008
    • 7958

    I get LuCC but what about UL but not locked?

    I understand the concept of an unloaded pistol in a locked container (LUCC or Locked Unloaded Container Carry) very well. Its a much better alternative to UOC.

    What is the penalty for Unloaded but not in a locked container, i.e. an unloaded pistol in a briefcase with a full magazine in your pocket?

    How about a unloaded pistol in an ankle holster (upon your person) and a full magazine in your pocket?

    Are these misdemeanors or felonies?
    Last edited by bubbapug1; 08-08-2009, 12:45 PM. Reason: wrong acronym
    I love America for the rights and freedoms we used to have.
  • #2
    CitaDeL
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2007
    • 5843

    Originally posted by bubbapug1
    I understand the concept of an unloaded pistol in a locked container very well. Its a much better alternative to UOC.

    What is the penalty for Unloaded but not in a locked container, i.e. an unloaded pistol in a briefcase with a full magazine in your pocket?

    How about a unloaded pistol in an ankle holster (upon your person) and a full magazine in your pocket?

    Are these misdemeanors or felonies?
    This violates 12025 and depending on geography 626.9. Whether they are misdemeanors or felonies is irrelvant as both are crimes.



    Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

    Comment

    • #3
      bubbapug1
      Calguns Addict
      • Nov 2008
      • 7958

      Originally posted by CitaDeL
      This violates 12025 and depending on geography 626.9. Whether they are misdemeanors or felonies is irrelvant as both are crimes.
      I don't think its irrelevent...its a legitimate question. If you don't know than just move on to the next thread, but don't get judgemental and blow off the question as irrelevant.

      It wouldn't be irrelevant to you if you were facing either a misdemeanor or felony charge would it?

      So does anyone else know the answer to the questions?
      I love America for the rights and freedoms we used to have.

      Comment

      • #4
        Invisible_Dave
        Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 269

        Back in 2003 it looks like more then 50% of the violators of pc12025 were charged as felonies. I recommend you take a look and read pc12025 and 12031 in its entirety. It will give you the sentence and charges in the text.
        The Internet; where men are men, women are men, and kids are FBI agents.

        Comment

        • #5
          Librarian
          Admin and Poltergeist
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Oct 2005
          • 44627

          Violation of 12025 - carrying a concealable weapon concealed without a CCW - is a 'wobbler' for first offense; that is, the prosecutor may charge either as a felony or a misdemeanor.

          So, there is no answer that does not depend on other circumstances.

          Search http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html for the text of 12025 or read it at http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/dwcl/12020.php

          'Full magazine in your pocket' may possibly get you arrested, but that is not illegal if you are not committing any other crimes.
          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

          Comment

          • #6
            Glock22Fan
            Calguns Addict
            • May 2006
            • 5752

            It will usually be charged as a misdemeanor if the weapon is registered to you, a felony if it is not. This is the same as carrying a firearm loaded. If it is loaded AND concealed, two misdemeanors or two felony charges.
            John -- bitter gun owner.

            All opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.
            I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

            sigpic

            Comment

            • #7
              CitaDeL
              Calguns Addict
              • May 2007
              • 5843

              Originally posted by bubbapug1
              I don't think its irrelevent...its a legitimate question. If you don't know than just move on to the next thread, but don't get judgemental and blow off the question as irrelevant.

              It wouldn't be irrelevant to you if you were facing either a misdemeanor or felony charge would it?

              So does anyone else know the answer to the questions?
              So you would advocate doing something illegal based on whether or not you would be arrested on a misdemeanor or a felony? Does the weight of the crime have any bearing on whether or not anyone should carry like the OP is suggesting?

              I'm not blowing off questions as irrelevant- I think that carrying in the manner suggested by the OP, and then asking whether the crime is a felony/misdemeanor implies that commiting 'small' crimes is okay. It's not and people (particularly advocates of the 2A) should act within the law.

              As with all questions, Calguns always has the answer.(Librarian rocks.)



              Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

              Comment

              • #8
                bubbapug1
                Calguns Addict
                • Nov 2008
                • 7958

                Originally posted by CitaDeL
                So you would advocate doing something illegal based on whether or not you would be arrested on a misdemeanor or a felony?

                I'm not blowing off questions as irrelevant- I think that carrying in the manner suggested by the OP, and then asking whether the crime is a felony/misdemeanor implies that commiting 'small' crimes is okay. It's not and people (particularly advocates of the 2A) should act within the law.
                To wit - act within the law...As is all protests to the Iranian elections should stop...or we should look upon the whole civil disobedience movement of ghandi and Martin Luther King as wastes of time. As in...blacks to the back of the bus, separate but equal education...congressional health care plan versus public health care...these are not just laws and need or needed to be rectified.

                I don't see where I suggested anything...I was just asking a question.

                Unjust laws should not be followed, and it is the highest honor and duty of a citizen not to respect or follow those laws which are unjust. However, in carry laws there is in my mind some rationality to not having hot ill tempered men with testosterone poisoning or meth problems walking around the streets armed with hand cannons. I can think of countless situations in my daily life where the presence of handguns would have led to shootouts. I also know I shouldn't carry, not that I am homicidal, but I do have a temper (as do most men I know) that could get me into trouble given the wrong set of circumstances.

                I don't plan to break this law, but I have a buddy who carries like this and I was wondering what his fate may be one day.



                HDT quote on slavery...

                There is a huge difference between a felony and a misdemeanor...my friend thinks in his case its the latter, but if he knew it was the former he might think twice because he would lose his entire collection.

                I appreciate your views, but I also think mass civil disobiedience (in tax paying) is going to eventually be required to stop the gutting of the public by incompetant politicians....1.8 trillion in debt in 2009...1 trillion here, 1 trillion there...eventually your talking about serious money!! As everett Dircksen said (but he uses the words billion, not trillion)
                I love America for the rights and freedoms we used to have.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Greg-Dawg
                  Banned
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 7793

                  What the heck is ULLCC?

                  up-left-left-center-center? New code for Mike Tyson's Punch Out?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bubbapug1
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 7958

                    What the heck is ULLCC?

                    up-left-left-center-center? New code for Mike Tyson's Punch Out?
                    LUCC or Locked Unloaded Container Carry - Sorry, I got it wrong and fixed the title too.
                    I love America for the rights and freedoms we used to have.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      bodger
                      Calguns Addict
                      • May 2009
                      • 6016

                      Originally posted by CitaDeL
                      So you would advocate doing something illegal based on whether or not you would be arrested on a misdemeanor or a felony? Does the weight of the crime have any bearing on whether or not anyone should carry like the OP is suggesting?

                      I'm not blowing off questions as irrelevant- I think that carrying in the manner suggested by the OP, and then asking whether the crime is a felony/misdemeanor implies that commiting 'small' crimes is okay. It's not and people (particularly advocates of the 2A) should act within the law.

                      As with all questions, Calguns always has the answer.(Librarian rocks.)
                      I act within the law.
                      But sometimes I do have thoughts as to which is worse:
                      Not being able to effectively carry a firearm to defend myself, or getting charged with a crime.

                      And thoughts do come to mind as to the severity of what I will be charged if I carry loaded and concealed. Will it be misdemeanor or felony.

                      I understand what the OP is talking about. Unfortunately in this nanny state, those are sometimes the choices we have to consider.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1