Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pro Gun Dems backout?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aileron
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 3272

    Pro Gun Dems backout?

    By Ken Hanson The vote totals from November are not even official in all races yet and a few Ohio Democrats are already giving gun owners reason to question their commitment to firearm rights.


    Looks like some dems are already waffling.
    Last edited by aileron; 12-09-2006, 3:47 PM.
    Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

    sigpic
  • #2
    Incitatus
    Banned
    • Nov 2006
    • 755

    Yet, Democrat gun owners are still buying it...

    Comment

    • #3
      Kruzr
      In Memoriam
      • Oct 2005
      • 1751

      Without an explanation of what H.B. 347 is, it's hard to judge if this is of concern or another sky is falling internet post.

      What new restrictions or prohibitions is the bill imposing on Ohio residents?

      Comment

      • #4
        paradox
        Veteran Member
        • Jan 2006
        • 3588

        Which brings us to Senator Goodman and Senator Stivers, Republicans who each accepted NRA and other gun group backing this past fall and then left gun owners at the altar with votes against H.B. 347. Don't come back until you've redeemed yourselves. In the meantime, we'll be recruiting and screening pro-gun candidates who will keep their word and vote the way they said they would while on the campaign trail.
        * Freedom is the human right to live your life however you damn well please, so long as you don't interfere with another's right to do the same.
        * "Don't believe them, don't fear them, don't ask anything of them." --Alexander Solzhenitsyn

        Comment

        • #5
          hoffmang
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Apr 2006
          • 18448

          H.B. 347 looks like a CCW improvement and local regulation pre-emption bill (mainly target at Cleveland if I remember correctly.)


          The Governor Vetoed it. The Ohio House over-rode. Now it looks like certain Senators (on both sides of the aisle) are not sticking with their old vote for.

          Funny that Ohio might lose its gun rights to Republicans. Kind of like how a Republican Attorney General in California cost all of you more gun rights than any Democrat ever - but since when did facts enter into a religious debate.

          -Gene
          Gene Hoffman
          Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

          DONATE NOW
          to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
          Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
          I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


          "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

          Comment

          • #6
            CalNRA
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2006
            • 8686

            Originally posted by hoffmang
            Funny that Ohio might lose its gun rights to Republicans. Kind of like how a Republican Attorney General in California cost all of you more gun rights than any Democrat ever -
            which one are we talking about here?
            Originally posted by cvigue
            This is not rocket surgery.

            Comment

            • #7
              aileron
              Veteran Member
              • Oct 2006
              • 3272

              Originally posted by paradox
              Title should be changed to “Pro gun politicians backout?”

              Ok... done, but where I read it, it was fingering a bunch of dems, but your right it wasnt all dems that backed out.

              As for the question of what does this do, it stops gun laws from being passed in counties and cities, and makes the gun laws uniform throughout the state. So if your traveling though one city you dont all of a sudden become a felon and then when your through that city your now just a law abiding citizen again, until of course you come to the next city or county where the laws could change again on you.


              aileron
              Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                hoffmang
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Apr 2006
                • 18448

                Dan Lundgren (R) appealed NRA's win against the Robert-Roos Act. If he'd left it alone there wouldn't have been an AW ban in California. Kasler v. Lockyer was originally Kasler v. Lundgren...

                -Gene
                Gene Hoffman
                Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

                DONATE NOW
                to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
                Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
                I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


                "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

                Comment

                • #9
                  mikehaas
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 1237

                  Originally posted by hoffmang
                  Dan Lundgren (R) appealed NRA's win against the Robert-Roos Act. If he'd left it alone there wouldn't have been an AW ban in California. Kasler v. Lockyer was originally Kasler v. Lundgren...

                  -Gene
                  And he CONFISCATED (not just banned) SKS Sporters because he thought it would help him in his '98 bid for guv. (but nothing on earth had that power)

                  Interesting reading:


                  Mike
                  sigpic
                  NRA Members' Councils of California 2008 Volunteer of the Year
                  Developer, Interactive version of the CA AW ID Flowchart
                  Owner/author, http://AmmoGuide.com/
                  Webmaster, http://calnra.com/

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Kruzr
                    In Memoriam
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 1751

                    Originally posted by aileron
                    As for the question of what does this do, it stops gun laws from being passed in counties and cities, and makes the gun laws uniform throughout the state. So if your traveling though one city you dont all of a sudden become a felon and then when your through that city your now just a law abiding citizen again, until of course you come to the next city or county where the laws could change again on you.


                    aileron
                    If this is the case, it doesn't sound "anti" to me. It sounds like it's in the favor of CCW holders. If Calif. had a law like this, San Francisco would have been out of luck long before courts got involved. What's the downside?

                    Ohio Legislature Passes Sweeping Firearm Preemption & Concealed Carry Legislation
                    COLUMBUS, Ohio, Nov. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Ohioans For Concealed Carry announced its support today for Ohio Substitute House Bill 347 after the Ohio Senate passed the bill by a 19 to 10 vote and sent it back to the Ohio House for concurrence.

                    "Finally after nearly three years of Ohio having a concealed carry law, license holders will actually be able to carry a firearm concealed in their motor vehicle," said Jeff Garvas, president of Ohioans For Concealed Carry. "This will end the justifiable fears that law-abiding citizens have of being charged with a crime because a traffic officer decides he didn't like exactly how you were trying to carry your handgun in plain sight to satisfy the vague law."

                    Ohio is one of few states that allow its local governments to pass firearm-related laws. By enacting statewide preemption of those laws, the State of Ohio shall join the majority of the nation, forty-four states, where all firearm laws will be created by the state legislature and remain consistent statewide. Today, an otherwise law-abiding person can unknowingly drive into a municipality and do something "illegal" that is otherwise legal in any other part of Ohio.

                    "Statewide firearm preemption is long overdue. Today's patchwork quilt of gun laws could change from various misdemeanors with jail time to "perfectly legal" all in the stretch of a five mile road between municipalities," said OFCC Vice President Bryan Torok. "The unknown legal landmines of owning a firearm are gone. Lawful gun owners will be able to rest assured that the laws that govern our possession, transportation and use of firearms shall be based on a consistent statewide set of laws."
                    Last edited by Kruzr; 12-09-2006, 9:40 PM.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      aileron
                      Veteran Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3272

                      Originally posted by Kruzr
                      If this is the case, it doesn't sound "anti" to me. It sounds like it's in the favor of CCW holders. If Calif. had a law like this, San Francisco would have been out of luck long before courts got involved. What's the downside?


                      [/i]
                      The AB is good, all good. We should copy that thing and make it an AB here.

                      The problem is the fact that some supposed pro gun dems and pro gun republicans have changed their vote now that their IN office. As opposed to what they said when they were running for re-election or running for office for the first time. Them doing the two step is bad for us all when it comes time to vote pro-gun in the house and senate.

                      aileron
                      Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Kruzr
                        In Memoriam
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 1751

                        The governor who veto'd it is a Republican.
                        Politicians don't have any principles other than what will get them elected again........no matter which party they belong to.
                        Last edited by Kruzr; 12-09-2006, 11:11 PM.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          jnojr
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 8067

                          Originally posted by Incitatus
                          Yet, Democrat gun owners are still buying it...
                          Like Charlie Brown and the football...


                          San Diego FFLs | San Diego ranges
                          I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. --Thomas Jefferson
                          ** I had my San Diego County CCW... you can, too!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            tacticalcity
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 10908

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1