Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Gun Dems backout?
Collapse
X
-
Pro Gun Dems backout?
Last edited by aileron; 12-09-2006, 3:47 PM.Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain
sigpicTags: None -
Which brings us to Senator Goodman and Senator Stivers, Republicans who each accepted NRA and other gun group backing this past fall and then left gun owners at the altar with votes against H.B. 347. Don't come back until you've redeemed yourselves. In the meantime, we'll be recruiting and screening pro-gun candidates who will keep their word and vote the way they said they would while on the campaign trail.* Freedom is the human right to live your life however you damn well please, so long as you don't interfere with another's right to do the same.
* "Don't believe them, don't fear them, don't ask anything of them." --Alexander SolzhenitsynComment
-
H.B. 347 looks like a CCW improvement and local regulation pre-emption bill (mainly target at Cleveland if I remember correctly.)
The Governor Vetoed it. The Ohio House over-rode. Now it looks like certain Senators (on both sides of the aisle) are not sticking with their old vote for.
Funny that Ohio might lose its gun rights to Republicans. Kind of like how a Republican Attorney General in California cost all of you more gun rights than any Democrat ever - but since when did facts enter into a religious debate.
-GeneGene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation
DONATE NOW to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!
"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Comment
-
which one are we talking about here?Originally posted by hoffmangFunny that Ohio might lose its gun rights to Republicans. Kind of like how a Republican Attorney General in California cost all of you more gun rights than any Democrat ever -Originally posted by cvigueThis is not rocket surgery.Comment
-
Originally posted by paradoxTitle should be changed to “Pro gun politicians backout?”
Ok... done, but where I read it, it was fingering a bunch of dems, but your right it wasnt all dems that backed out.
As for the question of what does this do, it stops gun laws from being passed in counties and cities, and makes the gun laws uniform throughout the state. So if your traveling though one city you dont all of a sudden become a felon and then when your through that city your now just a law abiding citizen again, until of course you come to the next city or county where the laws could change again on you.
aileronLook at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain
sigpicComment
-
Dan Lundgren (R) appealed NRA's win against the Robert-Roos Act. If he'd left it alone there wouldn't have been an AW ban in California. Kasler v. Lockyer was originally Kasler v. Lundgren...
-GeneGene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation
DONATE NOW to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!
"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Comment
-
And he CONFISCATED (not just banned) SKS Sporters because he thought it would help him in his '98 bid for guv. (but nothing on earth had that power)Originally posted by hoffmangDan Lundgren (R) appealed NRA's win against the Robert-Roos Act. If he'd left it alone there wouldn't have been an AW ban in California. Kasler v. Lockyer was originally Kasler v. Lundgren...
-Gene
Interesting reading:
Mikesigpic
NRA Members' Councils of California 2008 Volunteer of the Year
Developer, Interactive version of the CA AW ID Flowchart
Owner/author, http://AmmoGuide.com/
Webmaster, http://calnra.com/Comment
-
If this is the case, it doesn't sound "anti" to me. It sounds like it's in the favor of CCW holders. If Calif. had a law like this, San Francisco would have been out of luck long before courts got involved. What's the downside?Originally posted by aileronAs for the question of what does this do, it stops gun laws from being passed in counties and cities, and makes the gun laws uniform throughout the state. So if your traveling though one city you dont all of a sudden become a felon and then when your through that city your now just a law abiding citizen again, until of course you come to the next city or county where the laws could change again on you.
aileron
Ohio Legislature Passes Sweeping Firearm Preemption & Concealed Carry Legislation
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Nov. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Ohioans For Concealed Carry announced its support today for Ohio Substitute House Bill 347 after the Ohio Senate passed the bill by a 19 to 10 vote and sent it back to the Ohio House for concurrence.
"Finally after nearly three years of Ohio having a concealed carry law, license holders will actually be able to carry a firearm concealed in their motor vehicle," said Jeff Garvas, president of Ohioans For Concealed Carry. "This will end the justifiable fears that law-abiding citizens have of being charged with a crime because a traffic officer decides he didn't like exactly how you were trying to carry your handgun in plain sight to satisfy the vague law."
Ohio is one of few states that allow its local governments to pass firearm-related laws. By enacting statewide preemption of those laws, the State of Ohio shall join the majority of the nation, forty-four states, where all firearm laws will be created by the state legislature and remain consistent statewide. Today, an otherwise law-abiding person can unknowingly drive into a municipality and do something "illegal" that is otherwise legal in any other part of Ohio.
"Statewide firearm preemption is long overdue. Today's patchwork quilt of gun laws could change from various misdemeanors with jail time to "perfectly legal" all in the stretch of a five mile road between municipalities," said OFCC Vice President Bryan Torok. "The unknown legal landmines of owning a firearm are gone. Lawful gun owners will be able to rest assured that the laws that govern our possession, transportation and use of firearms shall be based on a consistent statewide set of laws."
Last edited by Kruzr; 12-09-2006, 9:40 PM.Comment
-
The AB is good, all good. We should copy that thing and make it an AB here.Originally posted by KruzrIf this is the case, it doesn't sound "anti" to me. It sounds like it's in the favor of CCW holders. If Calif. had a law like this, San Francisco would have been out of luck long before courts got involved. What's the downside?
[/i]
The problem is the fact that some supposed pro gun dems and pro gun republicans have changed their vote now that their IN office. As opposed to what they said when they were running for re-election or running for office for the first time. Them doing the two step is bad for us all when it comes time to vote pro-gun in the house and senate.
aileronLook at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain
sigpicComment
-
Like Charlie Brown and the football...Originally posted by IncitatusYet, Democrat gun owners are still buying it...

San Diego FFLs | San Diego ranges
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. --Thomas Jefferson
** I had my San Diego County CCW... you can, too!Comment
-
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,440
Posts: 25,044,552
Members: 354,731
Active Members: 5,810
Welcome to our newest member, Juan1302.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4586 users online. 147 members and 4439 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment