Tweet
If that subject line made you rage, I suggest you really understand SB 190 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...200320040SB190
"This bill would [...] include within the definition of an unsafe handgun, a center fire semiautomatic pistol that [...] does not have a magazine disconnect mechanism that prevents the pistol from operating to strike the primer of ammunition in the firing chamber when a detachable magazine is not inserted in the pistol."
I thought it was paramount to teach new shooters that a semi without a magazine inserted would absolutely be able to fire if a round was chambered. I taught my son that recently, racked it, removed the mag, and let him fire it. Lesson learned. Now there will be 3 kinds of guns. Guns that fire with a round chambered but the magazine removed, ones that don't because the disconnector works, and ones that still do because the disconnector is broken or removed by the user. So instead of doctrine we will have confusion.
It's mentioned here but the full gravity of the condition is not clear: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...w_Requirements
Is there any push back to this? Why are people not alarmed?
"This bill would [...] include within the definition of an unsafe handgun, a center fire semiautomatic pistol that [...] does not have a magazine disconnect mechanism that prevents the pistol from operating to strike the primer of ammunition in the firing chamber when a detachable magazine is not inserted in the pistol."
I thought it was paramount to teach new shooters that a semi without a magazine inserted would absolutely be able to fire if a round was chambered. I taught my son that recently, racked it, removed the mag, and let him fire it. Lesson learned. Now there will be 3 kinds of guns. Guns that fire with a round chambered but the magazine removed, ones that don't because the disconnector works, and ones that still do because the disconnector is broken or removed by the user. So instead of doctrine we will have confusion.
It's mentioned here but the full gravity of the condition is not clear: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...w_Requirements
Is there any push back to this? Why are people not alarmed?
Comment