Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Why couldn't a notary and a fiduciary offer a service

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pyrite
    Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 470

    Why couldn't a notary and a fiduciary offer a service

    This running around for transfers is a PITA.

    But I know it is necessary.

    It just seems that a notary and a fiduciary (or attorney) working together should be able to facilitate transfers like a service.

    Thumbprints are no sweat to notaries.

    Course, I realize that such a procedure wouldn't please the anti-gun crowd.

    Just wondering. Seems it could be a lucrative practice.

  • #2
    kenl
    Senior Member
    • May 2012
    • 1694

    Good idea but both the feds and kalif. law says the notary, fiduciary, or attorney need to have ffls, who then have additional restrictions on business licenses, actual location, security, etc, etc, etc.

    Bottom line, our rulers don't want to make things easy or efficient.
    sigpic

    California, the once-great first world state that is now a corrupt third world socialist cesspool.

    Comment

    • #3
      NorcalGSG
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 1293

      Or someone could flex and make the CA DOJ recognize that they are not supposed to legally require a pre-existing gun owner submit to an additional waiting period after passing the NICS check for purchases. That's already been established, there just isn't anyone holding the ruler accountable.

      Comment

      • #4
        larkja
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2013
        • 1362

        Sounds like good work for a mobile notary. Probably not enough $$$ in it for a fiduciary or attorney.

        Comment

        • #5
          deebix
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2008
          • 737

          Originally posted by NorcalGSG
          ... there just isn't anyone holding the ruler accountable.
          We are incapable as a people to hold anything accountable. That's why tyranny reigns. We all collectively forgot how to apply common sense to government. Oh well. Welcome to hell.

          Comment

          • #6
            ohsmily
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2005
            • 8930

            Originally posted by Pyrite
            This running around for transfers is a PITA.

            But I know it is necessary.

            It just seems that a notary and a fiduciary (or attorney) working together should be able to facilitate transfers like a service.

            Thumbprints are no sweat to notaries.

            Course, I realize that such a procedure wouldn't please the anti-gun crowd.

            Just wondering. Seems it could be a lucrative practice.

            Huh? It wouldn't be lucrative, possible, or legal. Firearm transfers must be conducted on the premises of the FFL with few exceptions (what you propose is not one).

            /EndThread.
            Expert firearms attorney: https://www.rwslaw.com/team/adam-j-richards/

            Check out https://www.firearmsunknown.com/. Support a good calgunner local to San Diego.

            Comment

            • #7
              BAJ475
              Calguns Addict
              • Jul 2014
              • 5037

              Originally posted by kenl
              California, the once-great first world state striving to become a third world socialist cesspool.
              Striving? From my perspective they succeeded.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1