Prop 90 just took a turn for the NO side.

[tenpercentfirearms]

Please go read this. http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/prop...nalysis90.html

This is not the pro or con, this is the analysis. I think anyone who read the analysis voted no. I know I did.

If the city took my land in ED and sold it to a private corporation, I would probably put my guns to use. Don't get me wrong. Using the courts to control our government is a sure expensive way to do it. I would prefer my representatives feared me at their expense instead of fearing a lawsuit at all of our expense.

[Mark in Eureka]

It might have saved a couple of ranges from being closed if the government would have had to pay the cost of replacing it loss.

[50ae]

This wouldn't have stopped the highway expansion because that is for a public purpose, it would stop them from taking your land and building a mini-mall on it though.

And I have 5 acres in the Sierra Foothills that has been threatened by a "Highway Expansion".. this is still the wrong way to fix it.