Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Time frame for Ninth Circuit to act on magazine ban

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Librarian
    Admin and Poltergeist
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Oct 2005
    • 44624

    Meta:
    Why would one have a PACER account without the ability to write off the cost?
    ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

    Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

    Comment

    • #17
      LVSox
      Member
      • Feb 2019
      • 185

      Originally posted by Librarian
      Meta:
      Why would one have a PACER account without the ability to write off the cost?
      I guess the answer would be because there is no cost to have a PACER account.

      If your actual question is why someone would pay to retrieve court documents without the ability to write off the cost (or have someone else pay), I guess the answer would be because they are usually otherwise unretrievable unless one wanted to visit the court, and one wanted to review them.

      Comment

      • #18
        OlderThanDirt
        FUBAR
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Jun 2009
        • 5610

        Originally posted by Librarian
        Meta:
        Why would one have a PACER account without the ability to write off the cost?
        I have had a PACER account ever since I worked for a company that got eaten by a three headed dog in 2002 and cost me $400k. The cost to maintain an account is zero, and the cost per document isn't that much, assuming you know what you are looking for. Browsing, however, can get get expensive.
        We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying. ~ Solzhenitsyn
        Thermidorian Reaction . . Prepare for it.

        Comment

        • #19
          robertkjjj
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 900

          Originally posted by LVSox
          Nothing is going to happen for more than a year, I assure you. Typical times for civil appeals in the Ninth are 12-20 months. This case is not going to be decided (or argued) before then. The Ninth will wait to see what comes down from SCOTUS in NYSRPA next Spring, and then act accordingly (such that they trample on our rights while purporting to follow the SCOTUS's holding).
          Imagine if the people who manage our justice/court systems today were in charge of the US Govt back when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor:

          12/7/41 Secretary of Defense: "Mr. President! Japan has just bombed Pearl Harbor, destroyed a whole bunch of our ships, and killed 2300 men!! What should we do?"
          Pres Roosevelt: "Welllllllllll, lets file some papers, and we'll have a meeting about this matter in six months. At that meeting we'll shuffle some more papers and then decide what to do a year later on it. Hopefully, if we do the same thing, with the paper shuffling and twice-a-year meetings for the 5 years or so, by then perhaps Japan will stop being bad to us and make nice again."
          NRA Lifetime Member. Hunter & Target Shooter.
          San Diego County.
          Passionate supporter of RTKBA.
          Supporter of conceal and open-carry.[/SIZE]
          "It's called the Bill Of Rights. Not the Bill of Needs."[/SIZE]

          Comment

          • #20
            Christopher761
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2014
            • 855

            Originally posted by robertkjjj
            Imagine if the people who manage our justice/court systems today were in charge of the US Govt back when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor:

            12/7/41 Secretary of Defense: "Mr. President! Japan has just bombed Pearl Harbor, destroyed a whole bunch of our ships, and killed 2300 men!! What should we do?"
            Pres Roosevelt: "Welllllllllll, lets file some papers, and we'll have a meeting about this matter in six months. At that meeting we'll shuffle some more papers and then decide what to do a year later on it. Hopefully, if we do the same thing, with the paper shuffling and twice-a-year meetings for the 5 years or so, by then perhaps Japan will stop being bad to us and make nice again."
            You forgot the part that they are just gonna let every enemy combatant across the border. And anyone who calls it an emergency will be attacked while eating dinner.

            Comment

            • #21
              rrwallace
              Senior Member
              • May 2016
              • 569

              Mean while how legal is it to use the 10+ mags we just got in the short window of sanity?

              Comment

              • #22
                Librarian
                Admin and Poltergeist
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Oct 2005
                • 44624

                Originally posted by rrwallace
                Mean while how legal is it to use the 10+ mags we just got in the short window of sanity?
                Wrong thread and wrong forum - see posts 70 and 71 in the sticky in the CA Laws forum.
                ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                Comment

                • #23
                  spalterego
                  Member
                  • May 2011
                  • 136

                  Oral Argument set for Thurs. April 2, 2020

                  Just to update everybody, Oral arguments are set for Thurs. April 2, 2020 at the Courthouse in Pasadena. Decision will probably not be for some months after that.

                  Case Name: Virginia Duncan, Richard Lewis, Patrick Lovette, David Marguglio, Christopher Waddell, and California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Xavier Becerra District Court Case No.: 3:17-cv-01017-BEN-JLB Court of Appeal Case No.: 23-55805 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filing Date Filing Party Document Description 6/6/2025 Appellees Appellees' Unopposed Motion to Extend

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    kris smith
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 2057

                    Is there any point in showing up to rally for support of repeal of the mag ban ? I have a group of people in San Diego and la areas that are interested in showing up for oral arguments and having a peaceful support rally outside. I have tried to contact 2a foundation and the FPC and heard nothing.
                    sent from the depths of my subconscious

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      LFOD
                      Junior Member
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 53

                      Originally posted by kris smith
                      Is there any point in showing up to rally for support of repeal of the mag ban ? I have a group of people in San Diego and la areas that are interested in showing up for oral arguments and having a peaceful support rally outside. I have tried to contact 2a foundation and the FPC and heard nothing.
                      I would certainly support this!

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        johnireland
                        Member
                        • Nov 2019
                        • 273

                        I'm for being there. I'm sure we could get a nice group together.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          NorCalAthlete
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 1796

                          Live stream to oral arguments starts in about an hour and change. 0900.

                          Your views on any given subject are the sum of the media that you take in, scaled to the weight of the credibility of the source that provides it, seen through a lens of your own values, goals, and achievements.

                          You Are All Ambassadors, Whether You Like It Or Not

                          Pain is the hardest lesson to forget; Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity.

                          Bureaucracy is the epoxy that lubricates the gears of progress.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Solidsnake87
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jun 2006
                            • 4399

                            I'll be watching
                            Replying to craigslist for casual encounters is like pokemon with STDs. Gotta catch em all
                            If Hell ever needed a operations manual all it would need is a copy of California's laws
                            .

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              TBX
                              Member
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 413

                              Originally posted by NorCalAthlete
                              Live stream to oral arguments starts in about an hour and change. 0900.

                              Audio is horrible. Do they not know how to mute when not talking?

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                fawndog
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                                CGN Contributor
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 856

                                "Big Pimpin's Justice" is kicking this twerps a55 !!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1