Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pc 12131.5

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JPN6336
    Member
    • Apr 2006
    • 384

    Pc 12131.5

    Am I reading this correctly that the manufacturer has to request similar models to be listed?
    Or are we able to buy guns that aren't on the list if they meet these requirements?

    12131.5. (a) A firearm shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements
    of subdivision (a) of Section 12131 if another firearm made by the
    same manufacturer is already listed and the unlisted firearm differs
    from the listed firearm only in one or more of the following
    features:
    (1) Finish, including, but not limited to, bluing, chrome-plating,
    oiling, or engraving.
    (2) The material from which the grips are made.
    (3) The shape or texture of the grips, so long as the difference
    in grip shape or texture does not in any way alter the dimensions,
    material, linkage, or functioning of the magazine well, the barrel,
    the chamber, or any of the components of the firing mechanism of the
    firearm.
    (4) Any other purely cosmetic feature that does not in any way
    alter the dimensions, material, linkage, or functioning of the
    magazine well, the barrel, the chamber, or any of the components of
    the firing mechanism of the firearm.
    (b) Any manufacturer seeking to have a firearm listed under this
    section shall provide to the Department of Justice all of the
    following:
    (1) The model designation of the listed firearm.
    (2) The model designation of each firearm that the manufacturer
    seeks to have listed under this section.
    (3) A statement, under oath, that each unlisted firearm for which
    listing is sought differs from the listed firearm only in one or more
    of the ways identified in subdivision (a) and is in all other
    respects identical to the listed firearm.
    (c) The department may, in its discretion and at any time, require
    a manufacturer to provide to the department any model for which
    listing is sought under this section, to determine whether the model
    complies with the requirements of this section.
    JPN
    Once a Marine, Always a Marine
  • #2
    jnojr
    Calguns Addict
    • Oct 2005
    • 8069

    Originally posted by JPN6336
    Am I reading this correctly that the manufacturer has to request similar models to be listed?
    Or are we able to buy guns that aren't on the list if they meet these requirements?
    If it isn't on the list, it's too dangerous for us to own.


    San Diego FFLs | San Diego ranges
    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. --Thomas Jefferson
    ** I had my San Diego County CCW... you can, too!

    Comment

    • #3
      halifax
      Veteran Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 4440

      I talked with the owner of a high-end custom 1911 manufacturer about this very issue. I wanted to know why all the Perma-Kote colors weren't approved for CA if they are the same firearm but just a different color. We disscussed 12131.5. He said the DOJ used the "discretionary" clause to force all firearm models to be submitted. He would have had to submit nine ~$2500 pistols and pay for lab testing on each. The bill would have been nearly $100,000.

      BTW, those firearms are not returned to the mfg.

      3(c) The department may, in its discretion and at any time, require
      a manufacturer to provide to the department any model for which
      listing is sought under this section, to determine whether the model
      complies with the requirements of this section.

      More CS antics from our officials in charge.
      Jim


      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        Dump1567
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2002
        • 1621

        Originally posted by halifax
        I talked with the owner of a high-end custom 1911 manufacturer about this very issue. I wanted to know why all the Perma-Kote colors weren't approved for CA if they are the same firearm but just a different color. We disscussed 12131.5. He said the DOJ used the "discretionary" clause to force all firearm models to be submitted. He would have had to submit nine ~$2500 pistols and pay for lab testing on each. The bill would have been nearly $100,000.

        BTW, those firearms are not returned to the mfg.

        3(c) The department may, in its discretion and at any time, require
        a manufacturer to provide to the department any model for which
        listing is sought under this section, to determine whether the model
        complies with the requirements of this section.

        More CS antics from our officials in charge.
        That would mean S&W had to submit 248 guns. I have a hard time believing that's the case. But who knows.
        Watch & Pray

        Comment

        • #5
          halifax
          Veteran Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 4440

          Originally posted by Dump1567
          That would mean S&W had to submit 248 guns. I have a hard time believing that's the case. But who knows.
          Maybe S&W can afford better laywers than a small custom shop
          Jim


          sigpic

          Comment

          • #6
            Dump1567
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2002
            • 1621

            Originally posted by halifax
            Maybe S&W can afford better laywers than a small custom shop
            Or maybe they have the CHP contract.
            Watch & Pray

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1