Police chiefs oppose Proposition 63

[DartFrog]

http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article103588977.html

[nn3453]

They will add a LE exemption and then everything will be like always.

[abinsinia]

They will add a LE exemption and then everything will be like always.

They can't add or delete anything.. It's a proposition, it is what it is no changes allowed.

[njineermike]

They will add a LE exemption and then everything will be like always.

Unfortunately, I don't think they can. The legislature can add an amendment to bills, but i believe once a prop is written and proposed, it can't be changed.

[gogohopper]

IBLEOBS

See, this proves that LEO, their reps, and upper management have our backs......................LOL

[Jimi Jah]

They can't add or delete anything.. It's a proposition, it is what it is no changes allowed.

Until the courts get ahold of it? Remember prop 187?

[abinsinia]

Until the courts get ahold of it? Remember prop 187?

What do you think would happen? I don't think court cases would end up adding a LEO exemption, it's kind of a specific addition.

[Zin_dawg]

Unfortunately, I don't think they can. The legislature can add an amendment to bills, but i believe once a prop is written and proposed, it can't be changed.

Normally, yes, but there is this

SEC. 13. Amending the Measure.
This Act shall be broadly construed to accomplish its purposes. The provisions of this measure may be amended by a vote of 55 percent of the members of each house of the Legislature and signed by the Governor so long as such amendments are consistent with and further the intent of this Act.

Kinda odd, for a proposition, eh?

So, if the Legislature can amend this turd proposition, then why didn't they try to move it through the legislature, in the first place?

Hmmmm

[abinsinia]

Normally, yes, but there is this



Kinda odd, for a proposition, eh?

So, if the Legislature can amend this turd proposition, then why didn't they try to move it through the legislature, in the first place?

Hmmmm

The kind of have. They pass 7 laws recently adding everything in the proposition, and some of those bills they passed also modify this proposition under the terms of the paragraph you quoted , yes that's right, they amended the proposition before the voters even vote on it.

So it doesn't matter if this passes or not, we already have laws on the books starting 2017 which implement most of what's in the proposition.

[njineermike]

Normally, yes, but there is this



Kinda odd, for a proposition, eh?

So, if the Legislature can amend this turd proposition, then why didn't they try to move it through the legislature, in the first place?

Hmmmm

This started before the gunmageddon bills, and was initiated by Gavin Newsome as a way to circumvent campaign finance laws and introduce legislation even though he's not a legislator.

[bobbodaggit]

The proposition was Gavin Newsom's idea and he wants to be the next governor. He has rivals in the Legislature who also want to be governor. They all want to score political points by beating up on us. The Legislative rivals weren't going to help Gavin, and vice versa. It's not about the end result to us and squashing our rights, but the end results to them moving on to their next political job and getting more power.

Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk

[CMBrowning]

Gut and Amend. They will get their way

[Cheezle56]

Vote yes, if cops have to do things the peasant way, I'm all for . Maybe then they'll stop supporting anti gun legislation. Just like restricting the Police to on roster handguns and only allowed to use peasant legal arms.

[artb]

All BS aside, I intend to vote NO on Gavin Newsom's Prop 63. ...

[The Gleam]

All BS aside, I intend to vote NO on Gavin Newsom's Prop 63. ...

Ditto.