Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Senator Dianne Feinstein "Supports" the 2nd Amendment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Capybara
    CGSSA Coordinator
    CGN Contributor
    • Feb 2012
    • 15249

    I'll just say what we are all thinking, didn't she die yet?
    NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer

    sigpic

    Comment

    • #32
      71MUSTY
      Calguns Addict
      • Mar 2014
      • 7029

      Her lips move even in a form letter.
      Only slaves don't need guns

      Originally posted by epilepticninja
      Americans vs. Democrats
      We stand for the Anthem, we kneel for the cross


      We already have the only reasonable Gun Control we need, It's called the Second Amendment and it's the government it controls.


      What doesn't kill me, better run

      Comment

      • #33
        Sunday
        Calguns Addict
        • Jan 2010
        • 5574

        Di Fi is proof the majority of California's voters are stupid.
        California's politicians and unionized government employees are a crime gang that makes the Mexican drug cartels look like a Girl Scout Troop in comparison.

        Comment

        • #34
          monk
          Veteran Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 4454

          NSFW



          NRA Member
          SAF Member


          A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

          Comment

          • #35
            Cody
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2009
            • 2148

            Comment

            • #36
              Tasty
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 1829

              Originally posted by Hooligan
              Suppressors aren't cheap, if unregulated would that many people really buy them?

              Would bad guys buy them in significant quantities to really affect crime statistics? Would there be enough around to steal to affect statistics?

              The current lack of suppressors doesn't seem to be a hindrance to bad guys, so why would "gun" related crimes increase if they were available.
              Silencers are expensive BECAUSE they're regulated so there's a small market for them. What do you think would happen if the demand for them went through the roof? Companies that don't currently produce them would start to dabble in what could be another revenue stream. New companies would form solely to make them. There'd be so much competition that it would drive prices down.

              Gun related crimes wouldn't increase. That's just what the swine tell their constituents to keep them afraid and willing to surrender their personal freedoms to their overlords.
              As the great warrior poet Ice Cube once said "If the day does not require an AK, it is good."

              Comment

              • #37
                Mark77
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2016
                • 851

                I believe her..........

                Partisanship is cancer. Glory to the USA, glory to Ukraine, and I hope that someday Russia is free and the normal people have a voice.

                AR-15 parts for sale:

                https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...k-etc-san-jose

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1