Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Do Not Comply!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    snowdog650
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 1108

    Originally posted by billybobpd
    Maybe we need "sanctuary cities" where the local law enforcement refuse to enforce ............
    I bet Sheriffs Haney and Lopey would be willing to create whole counties ...

    Comment

    • #32
      Erichp
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 830

      Originally posted by AEtrane
      "OP...can you pull off an orange jumpsuit? I dont think I can"

      Sorry to break it to you, but freedom doesn't look good on you either, big guy.
      Maybe it doesnt. I would question what anyone thinks freedom is in this situation. If you think we are free, we just see things a bit differently or define it differently.

      IMO Freedom has a range based on social covenant, degree of law enforcement, and adherence. Variable by state and locality. I would beg to differ that is not freedom (for any reasonable behavior that does no harm or has negative consequence).

      Comment

      • #33
        Sharp Shooter
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 1128

        Well it didn't take the OP long to get banned.

        Comment

        • #34
          AEtrane
          Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 427

          "Maybe it doesnt. I would question what anyone thinks freedom is in this situation. If you think we are free, we just see things a bit differently or define it differently.

          IMO Freedom has a range based on social covenant, degree of law enforcement, and adherence. Variable by state and locality. I would beg to differ that is not freedom (for any reasonable behavior that does no harm or has negative consequence)."

          Freedom is not subjective. Your social contract viewpoint explains why you choose not to be free. You choose obedience under fear over self determination.

          Like I said, it doesn't look good on you.

          Comment

          • #35
            Gasman
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2008
            • 781

            Originally posted by moneyhauler
            Do not comply with these new bull**** laws. Disobey this crap. **** the kalifornee gubmint! Gun ownership is a right not a privilege! Stop being cuckolds for the state and be men on your feet,not knees!
            Noncompliance with a law is a personal decision. Advertising on a public forum that you're actively going to break a law is a stupid decision.
            Originally posted by tonyt22
            Im going to be heading on a road trip out to lake tahoe and was wondering if i hit a deer driving at night and it doesnt die can i shoot it or leave it on the road till it dies then drag it to the side ?

            Comment

            • #36
              rdtompki
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2014
              • 773

              ARMaglocks are not very expensive and one would expect the new BB Reloaded to be affordable. Buy one for each AR and avoid registration. If you have a couple of lowers that you don't use why not disassemble until needed? If you feel you need to ignore the law just think about the John Doe warrants in Wisconsin. Yes, these were finally deemed illegal by the courts, but would you put it past a dem prosecutor to seek similar warrants based on a presumption that an individual is holding illegal AW.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1