Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SB 894 - Jackson, 2016 - Criminalizes Not Reporting Stolen Firearm. - VETOED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CalAlumnus
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 817

    SB 894 - Jackson, 2016 - Criminalizes Not Reporting Stolen Firearm. - VETOED

    SB 894, as introduced, Jackson. Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.

    (1) Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that information about a firearm entered into the automated system for firearms remain in the system until the reported firearm has been found. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to implement an electronic system to receive comprehensive tracing information from each local law enforcement agency and to forward the information to the National Tracing Center.

    This bill would require every person, with exceptions, to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 5 days of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost, and requires every person who has reported a firearm lost or stolen to notify the local law enforcement agency within 48 hours if the firearm is subsequently recovered. The bill would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for a first offense, an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for a 2nd offense, and a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment, for a 3rd or subsequent offense. The bill would make it an infraction for any person to make a report to a local law enforcement agency that a firearm has been lost or stolen, knowing the report to be false. The bill would not preclude or preempt a local ordinance that imposes additional penalties or requirements in regard to reporting the theft or loss of a firearm.

    By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

    The bill would require every sheriff or police chief to submit a description of each firearm that has been reported lost or stolen directly to the Department of Justice Automated Firearms System.

    By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

    The bill would also require that persons licensed to sell firearms post a warning within the licensed premises in block letters stating the requirement that a lost or stolen firearm be reported to a local law enforcement agency, as specified.

    (2) Existing law prohibits a person from making an application to purchase more than one handgun within any 30-day period. Existing law makes an exception for the replacement of a handgun when the person’s handgun was lost or stolen and the person reported the firearm lost or stolen prior to the completion of the application to purchase.

    This bill would instead make the exception for the replacement of a lost or stolen handgun applicable when the person has reported the handgun lost or stolen pursuant to the provisions of this bill.

    (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

    This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

    With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

  • #2
    readysetgo
    CGSSA Coordinator
    • Aug 2011
    • 8689

    Should be noted the leg has been introducing this type of garbage every session for at least the last two sessions.

    SB-1366-DeSaulnier-Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.(2011-2012) VETOED

    SB-299-DeSaulnier-Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.(2013-2014) VETOED
    Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

    Comment

    • #3
      Colt
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 1596

      Would this include items lost in boating accidents?

      Comment

      • #4
        M1NM
        Calguns Addict
        • Oct 2011
        • 7966

        Too bad it also doesn't require the recovering agency to notify the owner within 48 hours and return it without a bunch of red tape.

        Comment

        • #5
          The Gleam
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2011
          • 11598

          While I check this page frequently, sometimes several dozens times a day if a bill(s) are being heard, every few weeks while reading the California 2nd Amendment Political Discussion & Activism forum I realize focus is being lost, and I start seeing posts like "what should I get before the ban" and How do I register my AR15?".

          This thread succinctly addresses this bill. It may need updates, but that's why it's being bumped and to get the importance of it back on the front page.

          SOOooooo many of these bills are being ignored, forgotten or lost in the minutiae of how many Anti-2nd Amendment bills have been introduced this year, that it's exactly what these legislators have been hoping to do since the beginning - to create chaos, distraction, and an avalanche so cumbersome that most gun owners simply burn out, see it as futile, and go full-blown apathetic.

          We can't let that happen.
          -----------------------------------------------
          Originally posted by Librarian
          What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

          If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

          Comment

          • #6
            bool1tholz
            Member
            • Oct 2013
            • 405

            Assembly Floor Session - Jun 30, 2016
            (Third Reading)

            SB-894 Firearms: lost or stolen: reports. Jackson





            (Majority vote it must pass by 41 votes in the Assembly)

            Score: Gungrabbers 48, Defenders of US Constitution 27

            Constitution loses. SB-894 passes assembly vote.

            Bill History:
            06/30/16 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.

            So waiting on Governor for Veto or no Veto.
            Last edited by bool1tholz; 06-30-2016, 11:13 PM.
            signature

            Comment

            • #7
              SantaCabinetguy
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2011
              • 15137

              Originally posted by readysetgo
              Should be noted the leg has been introducing this type of garbage every session for at least the last two sessions.

              SB-1366-DeSaulnier-Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.(2011-2012) VETOED

              SB-299-DeSaulnier-Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.(2013-2014) VETOED
              I didn't know that. Thanks for posting this RSG - hopefully Brown maintains this line of thinking.

              I'm cautiously optimistic about this one.
              Hauoli Makahiki Hou


              -------

              Comment

              • #8
                readysetgo
                CGSSA Coordinator
                • Aug 2011
                • 8689

                here.

                SB 894 Veto Message_2016-07-01.JPG

                Failed again juicebags.

                Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1