Folks,
There' s a new "BulletButton" 'tool' being marketed by Arms Unlimited. This was just pointed out to me by a good friend.

This device specifically mounts somewhere to rifle's Picatinny rail and has the BB "tool" on a retractable cord.
We've at CGF, over the past 6-7 years, warned that any "tool" used to activate a maglock [BulletButton, RaddLock, etc]
should not be attached in any way to a maglock'd semauto centerfire rifle or maglocked semiauto pistol. There
is risk of triggering AW status.
This means you should NOT, for example, have a screwdriver dangling from dental floss from your AR, or anything like that.
[Did you mount a pic rail on your belt or shooting jacket or watch or toolbox? Fine, then this device from AU would be OK
in that ultraspecific usage.]
Lack of constructive possession on CA-legal OLLs - meaning a separated-from-gun item used to maniuplate the gun without
triggering AW status - has a converse, where "if it's part of the gun and operates on the gun" then the gun can be regarded
as a 'semiauto centerfire rifle that has a detachable magazine". The logic and regulation that surrounds the legality of the
BB maglock works against a "built-in tool".
This is just not quite as visibly egregious as the magnetic maglock override" 'felony buttons' ("WonderWrench", "SuperTool",
"AR Mag Magnet" etc. some of whose users (of whatever brand) have been convicted of AW violations.
I hope to contact the vendor and discuss the issues with this product but I felt this needed to be noted ASAP.
Again,
- just because nobody's arrested doesn't make this legal in its depicted usage
- there's a chance nobody will ever be arrested/convicted
- WHY TAKE THE CHANCE? THERE'S SIGNIFICANT RISK/NO GAIN.
If you have one already, and don't wear a Pic rail on your belt or shooting jacket or watch or whatnot, I'd not
really have this in my immediate possession /near the gun, either. What with the tightening of various possession
scenarios with the Nguyen case, there's even less reason to push the envelope.
[Note that the above statements specifically do not include/refer to the "nubbin-at-the-bottom-of-the-mag" tools
sold by Thordsen and others. In these specific cases, such 'tools' cannot be used while on the maglock'd firearm
to operate the BB - since that specific device is locked in place. Only *another* nubbin tool external to the gun can
be used, on a freestanding magazine, and once the in-place mag is unlocked/removed it has the same status as any
other 'nubbinized' freestanding magazine.]
There' s a new "BulletButton" 'tool' being marketed by Arms Unlimited. This was just pointed out to me by a good friend.

This device specifically mounts somewhere to rifle's Picatinny rail and has the BB "tool" on a retractable cord.
We've at CGF, over the past 6-7 years, warned that any "tool" used to activate a maglock [BulletButton, RaddLock, etc]
should not be attached in any way to a maglock'd semauto centerfire rifle or maglocked semiauto pistol. There
is risk of triggering AW status.
This means you should NOT, for example, have a screwdriver dangling from dental floss from your AR, or anything like that.
[Did you mount a pic rail on your belt or shooting jacket or watch or toolbox? Fine, then this device from AU would be OK
in that ultraspecific usage.]
Lack of constructive possession on CA-legal OLLs - meaning a separated-from-gun item used to maniuplate the gun without
triggering AW status - has a converse, where "if it's part of the gun and operates on the gun" then the gun can be regarded
as a 'semiauto centerfire rifle that has a detachable magazine". The logic and regulation that surrounds the legality of the
BB maglock works against a "built-in tool".
This is just not quite as visibly egregious as the magnetic maglock override" 'felony buttons' ("WonderWrench", "SuperTool",
"AR Mag Magnet" etc. some of whose users (of whatever brand) have been convicted of AW violations.
I hope to contact the vendor and discuss the issues with this product but I felt this needed to be noted ASAP.
Again,
- just because nobody's arrested doesn't make this legal in its depicted usage
- there's a chance nobody will ever be arrested/convicted
- WHY TAKE THE CHANCE? THERE'S SIGNIFICANT RISK/NO GAIN.
If you have one already, and don't wear a Pic rail on your belt or shooting jacket or watch or whatnot, I'd not
really have this in my immediate possession /near the gun, either. What with the tightening of various possession
scenarios with the Nguyen case, there's even less reason to push the envelope.
[Note that the above statements specifically do not include/refer to the "nubbin-at-the-bottom-of-the-mag" tools
sold by Thordsen and others. In these specific cases, such 'tools' cannot be used while on the maglock'd firearm
to operate the BB - since that specific device is locked in place. Only *another* nubbin tool external to the gun can
be used, on a freestanding magazine, and once the in-place mag is unlocked/removed it has the same status as any
other 'nubbinized' freestanding magazine.]
Comment