Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster) **CERT DENIED 6-15-2020**

[oc16]

so its a waiting and numbers game now i was unfortunate to have not purchased any off roster handguns when the loop hole was still available but i did get my hands on a nice p38 its old, and outdated but its all i got :/

[JAWS]

We lost: http://ia601400.us.archive.org/30/it...44.docket.html

Can't find the actual judgment yet.

[ojisan]

"JUDGMENT dated *2/26/15* in favor of Defendants against Plaintiffs pursuant to order signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/25/15. (Meuleman, A) (Entered: 02/26/2015)"

[glockman19]

Can this be appealed to the SCOTUS?

[wildhawker]

Can this be appealed to the SCOTUS?

This was a district court decision. Next step is the Ninth Circuit.

-BC

[North86]

Order is here: http://ia801400.us.archive.org/30/it...91444.94.0.pdf

Basically, since we can still buy "safe" guns, the roster doesn't burden the second amendment. Step two is not triggered.

An individual's preference for a particular firearm was judged as out-weighed by the state's authority to ensure "safe guns", and since a few 100K of new guns were bought last year, the judge thinks we're lucky enough to be able to chose from those available. B!tch.

I think her speech needs to be restricted to a quill and parchment. Maybe she'll do less damage to the country then.

[glockman19]

This was a district court decision. Next step is the Ninth Circuit.

-BC

GOOD...Because this was a Terrible decision.

I hope the SCOTUS next case determines either "Keep & Bear" or "Shall NOT be Infringed".

How can ANY LIST not infringe on the ability to choose if your choice is NOT on the list?

[ke6guj]

that sucks.

only took 5.5 years to get through the district court. at least we can now appeal.

[Paperchasin]

Not surprised.

[glockman19]

The Judge said regarding the 14th amendment argument:

"Law enforcement personnel shoulder a duty to ensure public safety and
thus assume different responsibilities, risks, and rights."

It appears that Miller v. DC contradicts this by stating that Law Enforcement has NO OBLIGATION to Protect anyone.

Her contention that LE have different rights supports a 14th Amendment violation of a "special class of citizen".

[thedrickel]

It took that long to write up that stinker of a judgment?

[randomBytes]

couldn't bring myself to actually read whatever drivel she wrote to justify that result.

[wireless]

Ah thank God it's over though. We finally get to move on to a circuit panel...I think? Dismissed sounds like we can't appeal?

[jaymz]

Not at all surprised.

[bwiese]

Haven't read it fully yet, but note the judge _in effect_ said via ruling...

1. that one Pena plaintiff does NOT have the right to have the specific
gun that the US Supremes said that Dick Heller could have.

2. conficts with the vigorous essentially near-strict scrutiny ruling in
Sylvester

Onward and upward.