Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster) **CERT DENIED 6-15-2020**

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • advocatusdiaboli
    Calguns Addict
    • Sep 2009
    • 5521

    Originally posted by armenarian
    So we're winning? Safe handgun roster could actually be taken out?
    If you learn anything at all about gun laws in California, you should have learned two things: 1) it's never over until all anti-gun appeals and other delays are completely exhausted which can take over a decade and 2) anti-gun laws are made 10x faster than they can be nullified though the courts.

    So no, we haven't won anything except one battle which can be made quickly moot by the next one. Lee won won many Civil war battles, he didn't win the war.

    Fight on but keep your head, if guns rights ever come back to California, we'll by then all be dead.
    Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
    sigpic

    Comment

    • Librarian
      Admin and Poltergeist
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2005
      • 44626

      Originally posted by advocatusdiaboli
      If you learn anything at all about gun laws in California, you should have learned two things: 1) it's never over until all anti-gun appeals and other delays are completely exhausted which can take over a decade and 2) anti-gun laws are made 10x faster than they can be nullified though the courts.
      Right. Politicians need to be re-elected every 2 years or so - they need a 'checkmark' in the 'I did something about a problem' column. Nobody ever goes back to those politicians and penalizes them when that 'something' fails to do anything useful.
      ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

      Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

      Comment

      • Sputnik
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 2106

        I'm not sure I've ever used the words "politician" and "useful" in the same sentence...

        Comment

        • bill_k_lopez
          Banned
          • May 2011
          • 2836

          Originally posted by oc16
          so how long do you think the court is going to drag it along......
          Two weeks.

          Comment

          • mossy
            Calguns Addict
            • Dec 2007
            • 7201

            Originally posted by armenarian
            So we're winning? Safe handgun roster could actually be taken out?
            no. we are not winning in CA. the safe handgun roster will be around for a long long time. CA will NEVER be a free state. anti gun laws are passed at a lightning pace while we wait for "the right people" to take them down one by one 12 years at a time. as a CA citizen there are 3 ways to get you 2A rights back.

            1-move

            2-get a job that exempts you

            3- ignore unconstitutional laws

            if you want to legally import a new standard cap mag into CA or buy a un-neutered AR-15 you will be dead before the laws saying you cant are overturned.
            Last edited by mossy; 12-10-2014, 10:05 PM.
            best troll thread in calguns history
            http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=406739



            burn the circus down cuz the world is full of clowns

            Comment

            • Bruce
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2005
              • 2183

              Originally posted by mossy
              no. we are not winning in CA. the safe handgun roster will be around for a long long time. CA will NEVER be a free state. anti gun laws are passed at a lightning pace while we wait for "the right people" to take them down one by one 12 years at a time. as a CA citizen there are 3 ways to get you 2A rights back.

              1-move

              2-get a job that exempts you

              3- ignore unconstitutional laws

              if you want to legally import a new standard cap mag into CA or buy a un-neutered AR-15 you will be dead before the laws saying you cant are overturned.
              Yup.

              Comment

              • BCG7
                Junior Member
                • Dec 2014
                • 40

                Wish I had more money to have bought more SSE pistols

                Comment

                • advocatusdiaboli
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 5521

                  Originally posted by mossy
                  no. we are not winning in CA. the safe handgun roster will be around for a long long time. CA will NEVER be a free state. anti gun laws are passed at a lightning pace while we wait for "the right people" to take them down one by one 12 years at a time. as a CA citizen there are 3 ways to get you 2A rights back.

                  1-move

                  2-get a job that exempts you

                  3- ignore unconstitutional laws

                  if you want to legally import a new standard cap mag into CA or buy a un-neutered AR-15 you will be dead before the laws saying you cant are overturned.
                  Sigh. So true. And California still has a higher per capita crime rate than Texas. All and anti-gun laws have accomplished nothing but offers feel-good political gains for pandering Democrats voted for by knee-jerk gun-fearing Californians.
                  Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • kemasa
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 10706

                    There is no penalty for the politicians or the courts for delaying the throwing out of laws which violate the Rights of people, so they can delay as long as they can and pass laws which are obviously a violation.
                    Kemasa.
                    False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

                    Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

                    Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

                    Comment

                    • Milkman661
                      Junior Member
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 3

                      If the handgun roster is meant to only allow "safe" guns to be purchased in California and pass testing such as a drop test. How is it that the fmk 9 gen 2 is still allowed to be purchased in cali. In the video below it compares the fmk against a glock and xd and the only one that sets off the primer is the fmk.

                      Comment

                      • Librarian
                        Admin and Poltergeist
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 44626

                        Originally posted by Milkman661
                        If the handgun roster is meant to only allow "safe" guns to be purchased in California and pass testing such as a drop test. How is it that the fmk 9 gen 2 is still allowed to be purchased in cali. In the video below it compares the fmk against a glock and xd and the only one that sets off the primer is the fmk.

                        http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WrY58Fkl7Bc
                        As many seem to begin, it appears you are making the error of assuming the Roster, and any other CA gun law, is actually about guns.

                        They are not.

                        They are vehicles to demonstrate that a legislator votes for 'something that addresses a problem' and therefore should be re-elected. ('There is a problem. We must do something. This bill is something, therefore voting in favor is doing something about the problem.')

                        That effect is amplified by party discipline that means 'vote as we tell you, or the bills you introduce will never get out of committee' - a legislator who gets no bills passed does not get re-elected.
                        Last edited by Librarian; 12-14-2014, 6:02 PM.
                        ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                        Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                        Comment

                        • Bruce
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 2183

                          Originally posted by Milkman661
                          If the handgun roster is meant to only allow "safe" guns to be purchased in California and pass testing such as a drop test. How is it that the fmk 9 gen 2 is still allowed to be purchased in cali. In the video below it compares the fmk against a glock and xd and the only one that sets off the primer is the fmk.

                          http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WrY58Fkl7Bc
                          The Safe Handgun Roster was meant to run the Davis, Lorcin and Raven pistols out of the state and take a lot of others along with them, ie; 2" revolvers(S&W,COLT,Rossi<Taurus,Ruger), semi autos without manual safeties (Glock). These latter provisions were removed at the last minute in order to get the bill passed.

                          Comment

                          • CSTactical
                            Vendor/Retailer
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 4067

                            Originally posted by Librarian
                            As many seem to begin, it appears you are making the error of assuming the Roster, and any other CA gun law, is actually about guns.

                            They are not.

                            They are vehicles to demonstrate that a legislator votes for 'something that addresses a problem' and therefore should be re-elected. ('There is a problem. We must do something. This bill is something, therefore voting in favor is doing something about the problem.')

                            That effect is amplified by party discipline that means 'vote as we tell you, or the bills you introduce will never get out of committee' - a legislator who gets no bills passed does not get re-elected.

                            Exactly...
                            Dealer for Zero Compromise Optic, Tangent Theta, Leupold, Nightforce, Vortex, Aimpoint, Desert Tech, Swarovski and more...
                            Call 916-670-1103 for Calguns pricing
                            www.cstactical.com
                            sales@cstactical.com
                            916-670-1103

                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • theoldroaddog
                              Junior Member
                              • Dec 2013
                              • 21

                              I think we are in need of a different tactic. Go after the State for interstate commerce and NAFTA violations instead of 2A violations. May have an easier time with the courts.


                              Jay
                              theoldroaddog

                              Comment

                              • Kid Stanislaus
                                Veteran Member
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 4419

                                Originally posted by Kasparov
                                Yes. As soon as the pigs fly...
                                Two weeks?
                                Things usually turn out best for those who make the best of how things turn out.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1