Duncan v Bonta: second trip to the 9th Circus

[BAJ475]

If this case is denied cert it means freedom week magazines become illegal.

Not for those of us who had the foresight to move to a free state. But just one more reason to not apply for a CA CCW, despite that being technically possible.

[eho0925]

Not for those of us who had the foresight to move to a free state. But just one more reason to not apply for a CA CCW, despite that being technically possible.

Why should folks not apply for a CCW? Duncan deals with standard capacity magazines… yeah, CA folks might not be able to carry their standard capacity mags, until this issue is finally resolved by SCOTUS (in the next term or two…). Are you suggesting CA folks, or out of state applicants go unarmed?

[BAJ475]

Why should folks not apply for a CCW? Duncan deals with standard capacity magazines… yeah, CA folks might not be able to carry their standard capacity mags, until this issue is finally resolved by SCOTUS (in the next term or two…). Are you suggesting CA folks, or out of state applicants go unarmed?

I am definitely not suggesting that CA folks go unarmed. What I am suggesting is that for a non-resident like myself, the added requirement to purchase 10 round magazines for my Canik MC9LS and my Sig P365 XL Macro when combined with the cost of obtaining an CA CCW, that is only good for two years, and SB2's limitations on where I could lawfully carry in CA, makes a CA CCW close to worthless and definitely not worth the time and expense.

[eho0925]

I am definitely not suggesting that CA folks go unarmed. What I am suggesting is that for a non-resident like myself, the added requirement to purchase 10 round magazines for my Canik MC9LS and my Sig P365 XL Macro when combined with the cost of obtaining an CA CCW, that is only good for two years, and SB2's limitations on where I could lawfully carry in CA, makes a CA CCW close to worthless and definitely not worth the time and expense.

If you’re not traveling into CA often… I’d agree… hopefully HR 38 gets passed, and we see National Reciprocity.

[7.62mm_fmj]

If this case is denied cert it means freedom week magazines become illegal.

And will this fact be the impetus for SCOTUS to take this case?

[abinsinia]

And will this fact be the impetus for SCOTUS to take this case?

I don't think so.

[Misterclick]

I'm confused? This states that its going back to the Supreme Court potentially next week? Is this true? Not sure how to confirm. https://www.survivalworld.com/second...s-the-country/

[nosuchagency]

other than crpa, imo the only other legitimate source for activity on case is following: https://michellawyers.com/duncan-v-becerra/

[Misterclick]

Something is up, here is another mention on MSN. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bi...1G6rEC#image=1

And thank you for that site Nosuch. I will save it in my stash!

[Misterclick]

CRPA: image.png

[nosuchagency]

crpa tv interviewed Atty Michel yesterday and he stated firm is filing cert with scotus next week so there you go.

[BobB35]

While I hope the SCOTUS take up this case on cert. I am pessimistic they will

They passed on Ocean State and then on friday they passed on the Washington DC mag ban case. They are shirking thier duties and relegating the 2A to second class status. I don't see that changing as long as Roberts is around.

[nosuchagency]

ocean state is on prelim injunction and hasn't run its course within inferior court system; duncan has completed all hurdles (x2), has affected citizens in the most populace state in US for decades, threatens to take property from same ( i.e., leftists' long game of incrementalism), and is the only venue remaining.

imo, between ocean state and duncan, the latter is the clear choice to set precedent and i suspect scotus may have been awaiting duncan's return all along; especially after saint benitez' incredible work along with the scathing dissents from 9th setting stage and having done all the heavy lifting.

[abinsinia]

I wonder if they won't take Snope , then I'm not sure why they would take Duncan.

[abinsinia]

NOTICE from USCA re 150 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit re: USCA: Case Number: 23-55805: The application for an extension of time within which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case has been presented to Justice Kagan, who on June 5, 2025, extended the time to and including July18, 2025. This letter has been sent to those designated on the attachednotification list.(dim) (Entered: 06/09/2025)

CRPA needs more time I guess.