Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

May v. Bonta - Challenge to SB2 consolidated with Carralero, ORAL ARGS April 2024

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BigPimping
    replied
    Still no word from the court eh?????

    Leave a comment:


  • splithoof
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostHeaven
    I have to see what happens in November 2024 before making any sweeping statements about the future of this great nation.
    Some of us have been waiting for decades while patiently hoping that the judicial system would in fact be honest, just, and following of the constitution. That has not happened. As I have grown much older, I realize that my years are limited. I can no longer wait for the courts to fix problems when in fact those same courts are fully half of the problem. The other half of the problem are the politicians and the ignorant voters who elected them.
    I do what I want, and accept the risk that goes with my choices.

    Leave a comment:


  • PrayForAmerica
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostHeaven
    I have to see what happens in November 2024 before making any sweeping statements about the future of this great nation.
    Yep; and who knows if one politician can actually stem or reverse the tide? It is a massive uphill battle.

    On the larger picture, almost nobody with any power to do anything is talking about the indoctrination on the public dime of our students. We're clinging to a meager legal win here or there, while they are indoctrinating an entire upcoming generation. Sometimes I think this is all just a distraction to keep our eyes off of what they are really doing Which is capturing an entire upcoming generation

    Leave a comment:


  • PrayForAmerica
    replied
    Originally posted by 22Terminator
    " In sum, the most serious harm the State would suffer if no stay were issued
    is the hurt pride of the politicians who enacted SB 2 to willingly frustrate and
    nullify the Supreme Court?s recognition that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry."

    If the 9th Circuit issue a stay, then they are not Judges.... but backroom dirty politicians with a gavel.
    That would be a serious banger if they quoted that last bit
    But yes, it is concerning how the actual rule of law means less than nothing to Leftists these days

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostHeaven
    replied
    I have to see what happens in November 2024 before making any sweeping statements about the future of this great nation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Capybara
    replied
    SB2 and the worst parts of it are fait accompli.

    Leave a comment:


  • edfardos
    replied
    yah, its a total loss, sorry. though i do believe the faces on the currency of The Second Constitutional Republic of America are walking among us today. Maybe May. who knows, hoping for the best.

    Leave a comment:


  • splithoof
    replied
    Originally posted by 22Terminator
    If the 9th Circuit issue a stay, then they are not Judges.... but backroom dirty politicians with a gavel.
    We already know that, and so do the Eunuchs of SCOTUS, who are powerless to do anything about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • 22Terminator
    replied
    Originally posted by PrayForAmerica
    Reading it now, this is fantastic. Hopes and prayers and crossed fingers.
    " In sum, the most serious harm the State would suffer if no stay were issued
    is the hurt pride of the politicians who enacted SB 2 to willingly frustrate and
    nullify the Supreme Court?s recognition that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry."

    If the 9th Circuit issue a stay, then they are not Judges.... but backroom dirty politicians with a gavel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul S
    replied
    Originally posted by 7.62mm_fmj
    The State's brief is due in 92 minutes. Can't wait to read their word salad argument.
    The state could submit a copy of the poem "Mary Had a Little Lamb" and the 9th Circus panel would still grant a stay of the injunction. That allows the 9th to bury the issue in judicial calendaring foolishness and the state will have an unfettered 3 year run of the unconstitutional law.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigPimping
    replied
    Any news on this please?

    Leave a comment:


  • PrayForAmerica
    replied
    Originally posted by meanspartan
    Yep, here is our brief that was filed earlier today.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SZj...VTy9iqPvk/view
    Reading it now, this is fantastic. Hopes and prayers and crossed fingers.

    Leave a comment:


  • taperxz
    replied
    Originally posted by meanspartan
    Yep, here is our brief that was filed earlier today.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SZj...VTy9iqPvk/view
    Still need to tell Chuck to give you a raise so you can get a bigger TV

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostHeaven
    replied
    Originally posted by Rickybillegas
    If the above named Judges are indeed our assigned panel, then here's the scoop:

    Judge William Fletcher (Clinton) is a supposed pragmatist, but ruled n 2016 that the 2nd amendment did not support the right to carry (EGADS!)

    Judge Richard Tallman (Clinton) was appointed by Clinton, but is actually listed as republican and there's this:

    "Tallman is a Republican appointed by Clinton in a deal made with conservative senators in 1996."

    Judge Lee was appointed by trump. "What liberals really don?t like is that Mr. Lee dissented from progressive doctrines on racial preferences, among other issues."[

    So, maybe, just maybe we will have two on our side?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostHeaven
    replied
    Originally posted by 707electrician
    This is rich. In all other cases the state asks for an emergency stay to uphold the status quo while the case is being adjudicated, and in this case they are asking for an emergency stay to strike down the status quo, and yet I am sure the 9th circus will use some superb mental gymnastics to grant the stay.
    Democrats believe firearms are evil harbingers of mass destruction, and Second Amendment supporters are far-right radicals hellbent on murder. Thus, every position that points towards more civilian disarmament qualifies as good and just. Elites support the anti-gun agenda in order to facilitate their globalist totalitarian goals of converting the last mostly free population on Earth to serfdom, like everywhere else.

    Defeating Democrats in every way possible is the overarching goal to preserve our fundamental liberties.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
UA-8071174-1