Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[Bhobbs]

The ripple effects from SCOTUS not taking Duncan or Bianchi will take years to sort out. Their failure has been costly.

[DolphinFan]

I predict SCOTUS steps in before the end of the year and upholds Benitez and scolds the 9th.
A Right delayed is a Right Denied.
Oh well, my AR?s will need to stay in current configuration for a little longer.
I have a totally neutered fixed 10 round M4 version and an M2 version, no flash hider, no pistol grip, detachable magazines. Only need to replace the monster man stock and reinstall the pistol grip when the time comes.
And based on the rules of a fast and speedy trial, will be decided within 100 days. So it could be drawn out until February 5, before we have a decision and SCOUTS intervention.
The sand in the hourglass is running out.

[Bhobbs]

SCOTUS will only step in to protect government interests. Anyone expecting them to step in to protect our rights is lying to themselves.

[EM2]

I predict SCOTUS steps in before the end of the year and upholds Benitez and scolds the 9th.
A Right delayed is a Right Denied.
Oh well, my AR?s will need to stay in current configuration for a little longer.
I have a totally neutered fixed 10 round M4 version and an M2 version, no flash hider, no pistol grip, detachable magazines. Only need to replace the monster man stock and reinstall the pistol grip when the time comes.
And based on the rules of a fast and speedy trial, will be decided within 100 days. So it could be drawn out until February 5, before we have a decision and SCOUTS intervention.
The sand in the hourglass is running out.

[troyPhD]

I predict SCOTUS steps in before the end of the year and upholds Benitez and scolds the 9th.
A Right delayed is a Right Denied.
Oh well, my AR?s will need to stay in current configuration for a little longer.
I have a totally neutered fixed 10 round M4 version and an M2 version, no flash hider, no pistol grip, detachable magazines. Only need to replace the monster man stock and reinstall the pistol grip when the time comes.
And based on the rules of a fast and speedy trial, will be decided within 100 days. So it could be drawn out until February 5, before we have a decision and SCOUTS intervention.
The sand in the hourglass is running out.

Don't let blind rage impair your interpretation of realities on the ground. As much as we criticize anti-gunners for living in a make-believe utopian fantasy world, we should also avoid falling into the same trap and have realistic expections of how things work in the real world.

Here's a grounded, unemotional exerpt from Chuck Michel after Duncan was stayed.

https://youtu.be/-ueuM18FB68?feature=shared&t=555

[LEAD LAUNCHER]

Stayed https://www.reddit.com/r/CAguns/comm...onta_decision/

Down below I posted a couple Comments concerning this stay from above link-what do you guys think about these 2 posts-anyone agree?:


420BlazeArk
?
1 hr. ago
?
Stickied comment
In many ways this is actually good news. The administrative stay was likely to be granted anyways (it is an unfortunate but common aspect of these kinds of proceedings) and the fact that they?ve expedited the hearing on the actual appeal is very important. To contrast, Duncan won?t be heard until 2024 whereas we?ll see real movement on this case before the new year.



Sulla-was-right
?
38 min. ago
It?s actually great news! If the panel hadn?t issued the administrative stay, I would have expected an intervention at the en banc level within hours, and the appeal scheduling to be delayed well into next year, followed by returning it back to the three judge panel, then staying again at the en banc and scheduling a whole new trial for 2025.

[EM2]

It almost seems,... that SCOTUS is controlled opposition.

The judiciary drags things out, and SCOTUS periodically provides "hope" in a ruling like Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, only to see it drug out some more.

We resist revolting because we think "next time they will get it right".

[Bhobbs]

Don't let blind rage impair your interpretation of realities on the ground. As much as we criticize anti-gunners for living in a make-believe utopian fantasy world, we should also avoid falling into the same trap and have realistic expections of how things work in the real world.

Here's a grounded, unemotional exerpt from Chuck Michel after Duncan was stayed.

https://youtu.be/-ueuM18FB68?feature=shared&t=555

Anger at open corruption is not blind range. Anger that SCOTUS isn?t protecting our rights isn?t blind range.

[Bhobbs]

It almost seems,... that SCOTUS is controlled opposition.

The judiciary drags things out, and SCOTUS periodically provides "hope" in a ruling like Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, only to see it drug out some more.

We resist revolting because we think "next time they will get it right".

SCOTUS is like the English monarchy. A ceremonial body that people just pretend has any real power. The circuits are the Parliament.

[abinsinia]

Bennett screw us. Mark him down as anti gun.

[splithoof]

I predict SCOTUS steps in before the end of the year and upholds Benitez and scolds the 9th.

So it could be drawn out until February 5, before we have a decision and SCOUTS intervention.
The sand in the hourglass is running out.

It?s not an hourglass. It is a decade glass. I?ve been waiting ever since Patrick Purdy got the ball rolling back in 1989 or so, and the pigs in the legislature reacted with Roberti-Roos, which was signed into law by Deukmejian, a REPUBLICAN governor. As to your prediction, I hope you are correct, but I would predict that Gavin Newsome becomes President instead.
What a crap sandwich this all is. A lot of us will be dead and gone before this ever gets sorted out.

[MajorSideburns]

So, the hijacking of Duncan yields more fruit for 9 CA as the rationale for imposing this stay.

9 CA Stay:

(concluding that the attorney general of California is likely to succeed on the merits.

[MajorSideburns]

Down below I posted a couple Comments concerning this stay from above link-what do you guys think about these 2 posts-anyone agree?:


420BlazeArk
?
1 hr. ago
?
Stickied comment
In many ways this is actually good news. The administrative stay was likely to be granted anyways (it is an unfortunate but common aspect of these kinds of proceedings) and the fact that they?ve expedited the hearing on the actual appeal is very important. To contrast, Duncan won?t be heard until 2024 whereas we?ll see real movement on this case before the new year.



Sulla-was-right
?
38 min. ago
It?s actually great news! If the panel hadn?t issued the administrative stay, I would have expected an intervention at the en banc level within hours, and the appeal scheduling to be delayed well into next year, followed by returning it back to the three judge panel, then staying again at the en banc and scheduling a whole new trial for 2025.

No, this is just further delay. They will save the en banc review of this case when they exhaust these other trivial tactics of delay. We won't see any movement in this case until 2026 when the SCOTUS has been expanded with another two dozen activists.

[sparky1979]

SCOTUS will only step in to protect government interests. Anyone expecting them to step in to protect our rights is lying to themselves.

Truth

Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk

[Galli1565]

Does anyone have an actual link to the text of the latest stay?