Sure enough. With respect to the testimony of experts, that generally applies to issues or questions of fact that may not be generally understood. With respect to questions or issues of law, that is for the court to decide and it only needs the attorneys to point to what they believe are applicable statutes and cases. The court is its own expert on the law.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
They are just waiting for the correct date to put on it so they can file it.Randall Rausch
AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
Most work performed while-you-wait.Comment
-
Comment
-
Question. Who is the request for a stay directed to and who makes the decision? The entire court, the original 3 judge panel, any 3 judge panel or any judge the appellant chooses?Comment
-
So all they have is the Trap Gun analog? Put a fork in it this is done!
As far as the expert testimony. Col. Tucker just goes to show you there are dishonest gun grabbers even in the marines...yet he was an officer. This is from him and show a basic misunderstanding of firearms...so I guess all the LEO who carry AR15 are on the offense and are just planning on killing as many people as possible....the stupid is strong here.
he AR-15 is an offensive combat weapon no different in function or
purpose than an M4. In my opinion, both weapons are designed to kill as many
people as possible, as efficiently as possible, and serve no legitimate sporting or
self-defense purpose. Self-defense and military combat are different.Comment
-
So all they have is the Trap Gun analog? Put a fork in it this is done!
As far as the expert testimony. Col. Tucker just goes to show you there are dishonest gun grabbers even in the marines...yet he was an officer. This is from him and show a basic misunderstanding of firearms...so I guess all the LEO who carry AR15 are on the offense and are just planning on killing as many people as possible....the stupid is strong here.
he AR-15 is an offensive combat weapon no different in function or
purpose than an M4. In my opinion, both weapons are designed to kill as many
people as possible, as efficiently as possible, and serve no legitimate sporting or
self-defense purpose. Self-defense and military combat are different.The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.Comment
-
[Hint: You'd be in BIG trouble because - wait for it - AR15 is NOT military grade!!!]Proud CGN Contributor
USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected toolsComment
-
http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
sigpic
Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
contact the governor
https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
NRA Life Member.Comment
-
"Military Grade", in other words, "made by the lowest bidder". Every AR I own is better quality than the M16A1 I was issued.sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
So all they have is the Trap Gun analog? Put a fork in it this is done!
As far as the expert testimony. Col. Tucker just goes to show you there are dishonest gun grabbers even in the marines...yet he was an officer. This is from him and show a basic misunderstanding of firearms...so I guess all the LEO who carry AR15 are on the offense and are just planning on killing as many people as possible....the stupid is strong here.
he AR-15 is an offensive combat weapon no different in function or
purpose than an M4. In my opinion, both weapons are designed to kill as many
people as possible, as efficiently as possible, and serve no legitimate sporting or
self-defense purpose. Self-defense and military combat are different.There are some people that it's just not worth engaging.
It's a muzzle BRAKE, not a muzzle break. Or is your muzzle tired?Comment
-
If they are the same, then why have the full auto arms been banned for so long? Can't be owned in Ca at all. Judge B is a very smart guy, and I know he'll call them out on the facts. It goes to show how corrupt, and what liars, the left has become. I've met a former marine officer that is less than honest, and this "Col Tucker" meets the same criteria. Disappointing.Comment
-
The AR-15 started out as select-fire and there are still weapons in U.S. military inventory with receivers marked AR-15. The AR-15 design had to be modified to be semi-auto only and weapons officially designated AR-15 exist in both select-fire and semi-auto only forms. M-16 and the like are just military designations for AR-15 variants adopted for military trials or service.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,856,890
Posts: 25,025,316
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,882
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4394 users online. 141 members and 4253 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment