I'm not all that impressed with Benitez. He granted the injunction on his own well researched and thought out decision. Why haven't the folks representing all of us been assertive in getting that injunction overruled?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24
Collapse
X
-
And the reason he did that was because if he didn't, the ninth circuit was going to write one that was guaranteed to be less favorable to gun owners. He knew that, and he acted in the favor of gun owners.
And "getting that injunction (sic) overruled" means fighting all the way to the supreme court (after what is guaranteed to be a loss in the ninth) to make Benitez's ruling final, and that effort is slogging through the courts as we type.Comment
-
I think you mean to say he wrote a stay of his own decision.
And the reason he did that was because if he didn't, the ninth circuit was going to write one that was guaranteed to be less favorable to gun owners. He knew that, and he acted in the favor of gun owners.
And "getting that injunction (sic) overruled" means fighting all the way to the supreme court (after what is guaranteed to be a loss in the ninth) to make Benitez's ruling final, and that effort is slogging through the courts as we type.The satisfaction of a job well done is to be the one who has done it
Originally posted by RazoEI don't feel a thing when some cop gets ghosted.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BTF/PTMStay black, don't fake the funk. Peace out, yall.Comment
-
They're attempting to address the current situation where it's currently legal to possess and use magazines > 10 rounds except in fixed magazine semi-auto firearms with features. They're trying to get rid of that exception so that the magazines may be used in those specific type of firearms.Comment
-
Comment
-
I agree. The more I think about it I doubt we will be able to buy new. We will still have a 1in30 and a ten day wait. I doubt he will be able to address those. And I don't see how a stay of his ruling could be delayed 10days. But Benitez could legalize AWs allowing is to remove all the grip wraps. If that happens stock up on featureless now so you are good to go.Comment
-
Tagged for review...Member of: NRA / CRPA / Calguns Assoc. Fight for what's yours....Comment
-
They're attempting to address the current situation where it's currently legal to possess and use magazines > 10 rounds except in fixed magazine semi-auto firearms with features. They're trying to get rid of that exception so that the magazines may be used in those specific type of firearms.
I mean a win is a win, but it won't change my opinion on the practicality or desirability to own mag locked 2.0 rifles. It just isn't happening. No way, no how do I start converting featureless to mag locked 2.0. The Sparrow grip works just fine and leaves me with the most important feature of all - the standard mag release.
Of all the AW cases we could have gotten Benitez on, this one seems a waste. However, perhaps it is just me who can't see the long range potential of winning this case. I could be short sighted, I only play 2D chess.
Now can someone explain to me the 'Low Number Rule' that enabled this case to be transferred?Last edited by SkyHawk; 08-21-2019, 12:03 PM.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,192
Posts: 25,003,941
Members: 353,847
Active Members: 5,929
Welcome to our newest member, RhythmInTheMeat.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 11918 users online. 185 members and 11733 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment