Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[Bhobbs]

FPC filed a petition to lift the stay in Miller, which would allow the ruling to go into effect. It’s a long shot but at least our side pushing what they can.

[abinsinia]

here's the link to the request,

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5381/attachments/original/1656622590/Miller_v_Bonta_Motion_to_Lift_Stay.pdf?1656622590

[Bhobbs]

Even as biased as I am, that’s a very well laid out document. I’m sure the 9th will read the cover page and trash it.

[ShadowGuy]

here's the link to the request,

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fir...pdf?1656622590

I am so glad to see this!

Bring on the freedom!

[abinsinia]

I'm very interesting in the response from Bonta.

[ar15barrels]

I'm very interesting in the response from Bonta.

Bonta is not available for comment.
He's too busy on a zoom call with the 9th circuit justices on how they are going to stop all this.

[NorCalRefuge]

Bonta is not available for comment.
He's too busy on a zoom call with the 9th circuit justices on how they are going to stop all this.

One can always request an in-person appointment with Mr. Bonta:

https://oag.ca.gov/contact/meeting-request

I'm confident he takes this issue seriously and is willing to meet with all concerned citizens.

[Tere_Hanges]

here's the link to the request,

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fir...pdf?1656622590

Holy chit! That would be crazy if everyone's AR and AK could be converted to the god given right of "standard configuration", hahaha!

[BAJ475]

A lawsuit must be filed against WA for their mag ban

Has already been done. Just wondering why I have not heard about a request for a TRO based on NYSRPA v Bruen and the GVR in Duncan.

[Baja Daze]

here's the link to the request,

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fir...pdf?1656622590

Winning!!!!

In the end, Appellants’ principal, and necessary, argument supporting their
request for a stay was their claim that they were likely to succeed on the merits on
appeal. That claim no longer has even the slightest merit post-Bruen. Indeed, Bruen
establishes quite the opposite: Appellants have completely failed to establish the
required historical and textual support for their restrictions on bearing modern rifles
in common use for lawful purposes, and both the facts and the law in this case more
readily support summary affirmance than they do a stay. Because appellants are not
even remotely “likely” to succeed on the merits, the stay pending appeal should be
lifted immediately

[kuug]

Has already been done. Just wondering why I have not heard about a request for a TRO based on NYSRPA v Bruen and the GVR in Duncan.

Likely because a TRO still needs to be drafted and because the WA mag ban only went into effect a handful of hours ago

[Roswell Saucer]

A lawsuit must be filed against WA for their mag ban

I honestly am shocked to wake up this morning without seeing a injunction filed enjoining Washington State from enforcing their magazine ban. There is absolutely no way a magazine limit is constitutional in light of NYSRPA (not that mag caps ever were constitutional, of course - they've always been impermissible infringements it's just now SCOTUS has finally recognized the 2A for what it is).

[SPGuy]

So for the removal of the stay….they can sit on that for years if they want still right? Or because it’s a stay instead of hearing a case or deciding a case they actually have a time frame to follow?

[kuug]

I honestly am shocked to wake up this morning without seeing a injunction filed enjoining Washington State from enforcing their magazine ban. There is absolutely no way a magazine limit is constitutional in light of NYSRPA (not that mag caps ever were constitutional, of course - they've always been impermissible infringements it's just now SCOTUS has finally recognized the 2A for what it is).

[mag360]

Going to be a busy weekend for state goons to figure out how to take 3 years to update registration paperwork