Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Duncan V Bonta - large cap mags: OLD THREAD

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AlmostHeaven
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2023
    • 3808

    Originally posted by Bhobbs
    That's a good point and I agree. The issue is now that SCOTUS granted cert in Rahimi and the federal government appealed the bump stock ban, is SCOTUS going to take 3 2A cases next session? I'm guessing the bump stock case will be a priority due to it being a federal regulation. I'm not so sure Bianchi will be taken in the next session.
    We shall see. Perhaps this upcoming term, which runs from September 2023 to June 2024, is too soon to realistically wish for, but I think chances are genuinely good that the Supreme Court takes up an assault weapons ban and high-capacity magazine ban case during the September 2024 to June 2025 term.

    By "genuinely good", I mean that personally, I would forecast the chances at above 80% because by the end of 2024, there will likely be multiple circuit splits on the issue of whether the Second Amendment protects the right to purchase and possess assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

    Comment

    • darkwater34
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2016
      • 772

      But a Republic....

      Originally posted by EM2
      A government that protects individual liberty is a republic.
      Any government that uses the guise of protecting their people by stripping their people of their individual rights is no longer a Republic it is tyrannical. The word REPUBLIC on the California Flag should be removed and replaced with the word TYRANNICAL.

      Comment

      • ritter
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 805

        Originally posted by Bhobbs
        That?s a good point and I agree. The issue is now that SCOTUS granted cert in Rahimi and the federal government appealed the bump stock ban, is SCOTUS going to take 3 2A cases next session? I?m guessing the bump stock case will be a priority due to it being a federal regulation. I?m not so sure Bianchi will be taken in the next session.
        Bianchi was already GVRd, no? Seems they'd want to finish that one.

        Comment

        • cz74
          Senior Member
          • May 2020
          • 912

          Start of the 2024 - 2025 court session will coincide with the election, given recent violent attacks on justices homes, the far left will escalate and bully any justices that trigger them. Thomas and Alito won't back down, but the rest are snowflakes.

          Comment

          • Sgt Raven
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 3767

            Originally posted by darkwater34
            Any government that uses the guise of protecting their people by stripping their people of their individual rights is no longer a Republic it is tyrannical. The word REPUBLIC on the California Flag should be removed and replaced with the word TYRANNICAL.

            California has turned into The People's Republic of California, aka The PRC.
            That changes the definition of Republic...
            sigpic
            DILLIGAF
            "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
            "Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
            "The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"

            Comment

            • darkwater34
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2016
              • 772

              I think that I have seen this somewhere before PRC = PEOPLES REPUBLIC of CHINA.
              Might as well remove the bear and star and replace it with the hammer and scickle

              Comment

              • AlmostHeaven
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2023
                • 3808

                Originally posted by cz74
                Start of the 2024 - 2025 court session will coincide with the election, given recent violent attacks on justices homes, the far left will escalate and bully any justices that trigger them. Thomas and Alito won't back down, but the rest are snowflakes.
                We shall see. This past Supreme Court term, Justices Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett all held the line on several high-profile cases such as affirmative action, LGBTQ+ anti-discrimination, and student loan forgiveness.
                A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

                Comment

                • chris
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 19447

                  Originally posted by darkwater34
                  I think that I have seen this somewhere before PRC = PEOPLES REPUBLIC of CHINA.
                  Might as well remove the bear and star and replace it with the hammer and scickle
                  The morons in this state would gladly live under Communist rule because some fool told them it would be a utopia. When history contradicts every aspect of it.
                  http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                  sigpic
                  Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
                  contact the governor
                  https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                  In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
                  NRA Life Member.

                  Comment

                  • newbieLA
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2018
                    • 562

                    Originally posted by chris
                    The morons in this state would gladly live under Communist rule because some fool told them it would be a utopia. When history contradicts every aspect of it.
                    70% of the people in this state would have worn masks and taken boosters forever without complaining, the other 29% would've happily informed on those who didn't...

                    Comment

                    • darkwater34
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2016
                      • 772

                      When are the people of California going to realize that they are being cooked slowly in a stew of tryany. The PEOPLE of the REPUBLIC of China most people are in prison camps assembling your I-Phones, Tablets, ear buds, flat screens, ect. Comming soon to the REPUBLIC CALIFORNIA: most of you have already lost your right of free choice. California is already turning into that s$$t hole in that Stallone and Snipes movie where you get awarded *** wipe for cursing. A Republic is a government that protects its people by enslaving them what an fing laugh.

                      Comment

                      • RANGER295
                        Administrator
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 4000

                        Please stay on topic to Duncan or other cases as they relate to Duncan. Thank you
                        "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
                        ~Ben Franklin

                        159

                        Comment

                        • Chewy65
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Dec 2013
                          • 5024

                          Originally posted by RANGER295
                          Please stay on topic to Duncan or other cases as they relate to Duncan. Thank you
                          Please. Liek many of us my time is limited and I don't want to wast it wading throug gripes. However legitimate they be they don't update on what is going on with a case.

                          Comment

                          • Sidekick501
                            Junior Member
                            • Mar 2023
                            • 2

                            Are there any updates?

                            Originally posted by Chewy65
                            Please. Liek many of us my time is limited and I don't want to wast it wading throug gripes. However legitimate they be they don't update on what is going on with a case.
                            It would be welcome news if we heard any updates on this case or any of the other 2A challenges before Benitez. I mean anything at all. All I've heard are crickets since at least March, 2023, except for conjecture and prognosis on our part. We're moving on to month four and it continues to be eerily silent.
                            Last edited by Sidekick501; 07-24-2023, 6:44 PM.

                            Comment

                            • SpudmanWP
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Jul 2017
                              • 1156

                              Given that it is likely that all 4 cases are to be released at the same time and given that we have a minimum of 45-ish days for the known steps in the Rhode PI phase, we are looking to at least another 60 days till any case gets released.

                              Comment

                              • Sputnik
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2011
                                • 2098

                                Is there a reason to hold the other three while the state drags Rhode out another month plus? Is there some aspect of the additional “expert” testimony that might have some bearing? If not, why wouldn’t they be released each as it’s ready?
                                Is there any benefit from putting them all out at once?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1