Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Duncan V Bonta - large cap mags: OLD THREAD

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aBrowningfan
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 1475

    Originally posted by cockedandglocked
    It's not even an infraction - it's not a crime, at all. We won an injunction in the case that this thread is about. So unless/until the courts say otherwise, it is legal to posses LCMs.
    No to be pedantic, but the LCM(s) must have been acquired before the original ban was in force (2000?).

    Comment

    • CandG
      Spent $299 for this text!
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Apr 2014
      • 16970

      Originally posted by aBrowningfan
      No to be pedantic, but the LCM(s) must have been acquired before the original ban was in force (2000?).
      The law doesn't actually say that magazines you possessed have to have been lawfully acquired, it only says it is illegal to acquire them - a misdemeanor crime which has, iirc, a 2 or 3 year statute of limitations for prosecution. So effectively, if you acquired them before about 2014 then you're in the clear if you haven't already been charged with anything.

      The action of possessing LCMs is legal, regardless of how you got them. It's the action of acquiring them which is illegal. It's a little like cuban cigars in that way.

      Not that I'm suggesting people try to commit a crime or anything, just clarifying how the system works.
      Last edited by CandG; 09-15-2017, 9:25 AM.
      Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


      Comment

      • HiND-SIGHT
        Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 264

        Originally posted by cockedandglocked
        The law doesn't actually say that magazines you possessed have to have been lawfully acquired, it only says it is illegal to acquire them - a misdemeanor crime which has, iirc, a 2 or 3 year statute of limitations for prosecution. So effectively, if you acquired them before about 2014 then you're in the clear if you haven't already been charged with anything.

        The action of possessing LCMs is legal, regardless of how you got them. It's the action of acquiring them which is illegal. It's a little like cuban cigars in that way.

        Not that I'm suggesting people try to commit a crime or anything, just clarifying how the system works.
        thanks

        Comment

        • 426cuda
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2013
          • 14

          Originally posted by aBrowningfan
          I would settle for just being able to possess my lawfully acquired (pre-ban) mags.
          As someone who could not purchase magazines before the ban I would love to be able to buy a normal magazine.

          Comment

          • aBrowningfan
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 1475

            Originally posted by 426cuda
            As someone who could not purchase magazines before the ban I would love to be able to buy a normal magazine.
            Quickest path to achieving your aspiration would be move out of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Kalifornia.

            I would love to be able to buy a pistol that is off roster, too. But the only way that is going to happen near-term (maybe even long-term) is to move out of state.

            Comment

            • Adobe
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2013
              • 56

              Originally posted by aBrowningfan
              Quickest path to achieving your aspiration would be move out of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Kalifornia.

              I would love to be able to buy a pistol that is off roster, too. But the only way that is going to happen near-term (maybe even long-term) is to move out of state.
              Or use the roster loop hole.

              Comment

              • aBrowningfan
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2014
                • 1475

                Originally posted by Adobe
                Or use the roster loop hole.
                What loop hole?

                Comment

                • slayer61
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 1402

                  Originally posted by aBrowningfan
                  What loop hole?
                  ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
                  Paul

                  Confirmed Domestic Terrorist & NRA Member


                  Bobby Sands

                  Comment

                  • Bogart
                    Member
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 322

                    Loophole: They may have been referring to the single shot exemption. Which is no longer a route to off list roster handguns.

                    Comment

                    • wolfwood
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 1371

                      Today the opening brief gets filed by the state.

                      never mind they got another extension
                      Last edited by wolfwood; 09-22-2017, 6:26 PM.

                      Comment

                      • aBrowningfan
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2014
                        • 1475

                        Originally posted by wolfwood
                        Today the opening brief gets filed by the state.

                        never mind they got another extension
                        Why am I not surprised?

                        Comment

                        • painkiller
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 940

                          Or the intramfamiliar transger
                          everyone has a phtographic memory,some just dont have the film

                          Comment

                          • El Viajero
                            Junior Member
                            • Feb 2016
                            • 10

                            Any updates?

                            Comment

                            • aBrowningfan
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2014
                              • 1475

                              DPRK got an extension of time to file their brief.

                              IOW:

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1