Anyone use the 100gr GMX in .270 win load? I am looking to make up a flat shooting load to 300 yards for my .270 win for deer and hogs. That 100 gr GMX looks good for that, wonder how the performance is?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone use the 100gr GMX in .270 win load
Collapse
X
-
Anyone use the 100gr GMX in .270 win load
Protect public lands access http://www.backcountryhunters.org/Tags: None -
Cannot help you with a 270. That is one I will not have. The 100gr bullets seem like an excellent choice given my experience with the non-lead bullets in other calibersA 30cal will reach out and touch them. A 50cal will kick their butt.
NRA Life Member, NRA certified RSO & Basic Pistol Instructor, Hunter, shooter, reloader
SCI, Manteca Sportsmen Club, Coalinga Rifle Club, Escalon Sportsmans Club, Waterford Sportsman Club & NAHA Member, Madison Society memberComment
-
I would use 130 grain if you are going after hogs. I shot a 170 pound pig with 130 grain and would not have wanted anything less. I spine shot him but he still crawled about 50 yards on his front legs and was very much alive when I got to him. I had to lung him with my knife to finish him. Hogs are tough. the 130 grain didn't mess the meat up much and I wouldn't be worried about that with a deer either. As far as flat shooting. It shoots pretty flat out to around 400 yards with 130 grain and you aren't going to be shooting that far for anything in Cali anyway.
I would use the 100 grain for small coastal deer or yotes.Comment
-
I use a 130gr GMX bullet in my .270 at 2950fps - it's pretty much an ideal (lead-free) load for medium game in the ranges you're talking about. With a 200-yard zero, 300 yards is right at max point blank range for that round (i.e.: it shoots plenty "flat").
The 100gr variant will leave the muzzle faster, but it won't retain downrange performance as well. It only has a BC=.310 and SD=.186 - compared to the 130gr BC=.460 and SD=.242. Those differences are significant.Comment
-
yeah see your point, lighter bullet, loose significant downrange performance for minor trajectory gain.I use a 130gr GMX bullet in my .270 at 2950fps - it's pretty much an ideal (lead-free) load for medium game in the ranges you're talking about. With a 200-yard zero, 300 yards is right at max point blank range for that round (i.e.: it shoots plenty "flat").
The 100gr variant will leave the muzzle faster, but it won't retain downrange performance as well. It only has a BC=.310 and SD=.186 - compared to the 130gr BC=.460 and SD=.242. Those differences are significant.
how has the performance of the GMX been?Protect public lands access http://www.backcountryhunters.org/Comment
-
I've killed a 140-pound hog at 230 yards quartering away - the hog simply fell over dead. The bullet had disassembled his heart.
I've killed a 250-pound (est.) black bear running broadside at about 40 yards - the first shot de-lunged him and it took him a couple minutes to die, but he went down no problem. Lung shots can be like that.
Neither bullet was recovered, but they did exactly what they were supposed to do and the meat damage was minimal.
I have not yet taken a shot at a deer with that particular bullet, but I am happy with performance on other species so far.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,459
Posts: 25,032,301
Members: 354,530
Active Members: 6,432
Welcome to our newest member, Boocatini.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3135 users online. 77 members and 3058 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment