A number of parks in the Bay Area with good hiking trails are closing his weekend because of supposed fire risk, when there aren't even any weather red flag warnings. (And even if there were, that is still a lame reason to shut down hiking areas.)
Is anyone also highly irritated by that?
I get the feeling the government officials who run those places look for any excuse to either keep out all visitors so they aren't bothered by having to deal with people, or else just to "do something." Shutting down parks was unheard of when I was a kid and up until maybe 10 years ago. A miniscule chance of something bad happening is not an excuse to shut down the public land outdoors.
Specific for the East Bay Regional Park District (but some other districts are doing the same):
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2022/09...wn-some-areas/
It seems these "fire officials" have no standards, they just make them up. I have a strong feeling that if these parks got their budget cut by whatever percentage of the days they shut down per year -- so if they shut down for 5 days, they lose 5/365 or 1.3% of their budget, suddenly the parks would hardly ever shut down anymore.
I can't help but wonder if the wimpy, generally afraid-of-the-slightest-risk attitude of people in the Bay Area and California makes this happen so often. Is Nevada like this?
I suppose for now all I can do is complain on CalGuns, and write a letter to the local park districts doing this.
Is anyone also highly irritated by that?
I get the feeling the government officials who run those places look for any excuse to either keep out all visitors so they aren't bothered by having to deal with people, or else just to "do something." Shutting down parks was unheard of when I was a kid and up until maybe 10 years ago. A miniscule chance of something bad happening is not an excuse to shut down the public land outdoors.
Specific for the East Bay Regional Park District (but some other districts are doing the same):
The district said it made the decision after fire officials warned of a high fire risk. Weather officials have not issued any watches or warnings related to fire-friendly conditions
It seems these "fire officials" have no standards, they just make them up. I have a strong feeling that if these parks got their budget cut by whatever percentage of the days they shut down per year -- so if they shut down for 5 days, they lose 5/365 or 1.3% of their budget, suddenly the parks would hardly ever shut down anymore.
I can't help but wonder if the wimpy, generally afraid-of-the-slightest-risk attitude of people in the Bay Area and California makes this happen so often. Is Nevada like this?
I suppose for now all I can do is complain on CalGuns, and write a letter to the local park districts doing this.
Comment