Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

WTS: 16" Imbel Fal Parts Kit with Izzy Furniture *Reduced to $450*

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KracknCorn
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 785

    WTS: 16" Imbel Fal Parts Kit with Izzy Furniture *Reduced to $450*

    Located near the 605 and the 91 freeway.

    I have for sell is a Imbel parts kit with lsraeli furniture. The barrel was cut, threaded, and crowned by Randall at ar15barrels to 16". The barrel is nice and shiny and I wish could take pictures of it... but I need a better camera. The kit comes with a L1A1 mag release and bolt hold open instead the metric ones. It also comes with isaeli handguards with the aluminum spacers and buttstock. I'll include the original plastic handguards but it's not in the best shape. This kit contains everything you need to build a 16" Fal. You just need the correct locking shoulder and receiver and your good to go. Any question, ask away. Asking $500 ftf or $525 shipped Now asking $450 ftf or add $25 for shipping











    It'll look kinda like this when it is finished

    Last edited by KracknCorn; 01-24-2011, 12:36 PM.
    Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
    "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."
  • #2
    KracknCorn
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 785

    bump
    Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
    "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

    Comment

    • #3
      KracknCorn
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2006
      • 785

      bump
      Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
      "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

      Comment

      • #4
        KracknCorn
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2006
        • 785

        pm's replied
        Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
        "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

        Comment

        • #5
          KracknCorn
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2006
          • 785

          bump
          Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
          "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

          Comment

          • #6
            KracknCorn
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2006
            • 785

            bumbitty bump
            Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
            "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

            Comment

            • #7
              KracknCorn
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2006
              • 785

              Now $450
              Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
              "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

              Comment

              • #8
                KracknCorn
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 785

                bump
                Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
                "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

                Comment

                • #9
                  KracknCorn
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 785

                  bump
                  Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
                  "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    torsf
                    Member
                    CGN Contributor
                    • May 2007
                    • 444

                    is this still available?


                    Please note that others have used this screen name on non-gun related sites, and I am not related to them in any way.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1