Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bushmaster Varmint 24" complete upper ****SPF***

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CHUCK-E
    Member
    • Feb 2007
    • 110

    Bushmaster Varmint 24" complete upper ****SPF***

    From the Bushmaster website:

    "Varminter Special Upper Receiver/Stainless Steel Barrel Assembly
    This assembly features a brush finished 24" Barrel machined of 416 Stainless Steel (button rifled 1 in 9") as used on our Stainless Varmint Special Rifle. It includes a Free-floater Vented Tubular Forend with Bipod / Sling Stud installed, 1/2" B.M.A.S. Mini-Risers - with Bolt, Carrier, and Charging Handle - all ready for your lower."

    Shot only 100 rounds and I am the original owner. Very accurate & clean. Will include installed Badger Ordnance tactical latch, 1/2" B.M.A.S. Mini-Risers, & BCG. Barrel has one very minor flaw of what I would call "SAFE RASH" from just sitting in safe. Pic of so called rash is below. Scope & rings not included but will give only buyer of upper option to buy at time of purchase. Scope is a Nikon 3-9x40 w/ BDC reticle. I will discuss price of scope at time of purchase. Bushmaster has upper on website for $785.00 if its even available. Priced to sell @ $$$.$$. FTF cash sale only. Will not ship.
    ***********SPF to CJBrian************
    Will meet at Ammo Bros, Ade's, or in the surrounding areas of Cerritos, Lakewood, La Palma, and Norwalk.
    Last edited by CHUCK-E; 05-08-2012, 6:41 PM. Reason: sold
    sigpic
  • #2
    Sig226
    Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 459

    Darnit! I have been looking for one of these for a while now....If I hadn't just blown my discretionary funding on new tires for my truck I would bite on this quickly.


    Free bump for a very nice upper...Gluck with the sale.
    "The right "to carry arms in the militia for the purpose of killing game" is worthy of the mad hatter. Thus, these purposive qualifying phrases positively establish that "to bear arms" is not limited to military use." - Justice Scalia
    -Heller v. District of Columbia

    Comment

    • #3
      CJBrian
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 315

      pm sent

      Comment

      • #4
        CHUCK-E
        Member
        • Feb 2007
        • 110

        SPF to CJBrian
        sigpic

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1