9Th Circus issues STAY on Rhodes v. Becerra

[Kestryll]

9th Circuit Has Stayed the District Court's Injunction Order.

The fight for freedom goes on, but we are back to ammo sales restrictions for now. More to come.

The following transaction was entered on 4/24/2020 at 9:54 PM PDT and filed on 4/24/2020
Case Name: Rhode et al v. Becerra et al
Case Number: 3:18-cv-00802-BEN-JLB
Filer:
Document Number: 66

Docket Text:
ORDER of USCA as to [64] Notice of Interlocutory Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Xavier Becerra. The USCA has received appellant's emergency motion for a stay. The request for an immediate administrative stay is granted. The USDC's April 23, 2020 preliminary injunction order is temporarily stayed pending further court order. The USCA will address the emergency stay motion by separate order. (akr)

[Quiet]

Update

On 01-31-2024, an injunction was issued by the Federal Courts in Rhodes v Becerra.

The CA ammunition laws pertaining to:
1. The requirement that a licensed vendor/CA FFL dealer must be utilized to legally transfer ammo in CA to a non-exempt person. [PC 30312(a),(b)]
2. The restrictions on importing ammo into CA and the requirement for non-exempt person to utilize a licensed vendor/dealer for legal importation into CA. [PC 30314(a)]
3. The requirement that a licensed vendor/CA FFL dealer must submit an ammo DROS whenever they transfer ammo in CA. [PC 30352 and 30370(a)]
Have all be permanently enjoined from being enforced.

All other CA ammunition laws are still in effect.

[Quiet]

Update #2

On 02-05-2024, the injunction has been stayed, pending appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

https://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-02-05-Order-Granting-Mtn-to-Stay-District-Court-Ruling.pdf

Once again, all ammunition transfers must be done through a CA DOJ licensed ammunition vendor or CA FFL dealer.