Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Random target correction mil computation..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MarikinaMan
    Veteran Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 4864

    Random target correction mil computation..

    I was shooting my .223 rifle at a waterline at 599 yards to true elevation on my ballistic calc. I did a 5 shot test. When I retrieved the target, I was grouping with 2.5 inches on elevation but was off 18.75 inches off the line. WTH.

    Reviewing the data, I realized I made an amateur mistake. I left my ballistic calculator at 650 and not adjusted to 599.

    I don’t know about you, but conducting these tests take time and effort in going to the range and loading the ammo. Not to mention calling a cease fire to drive and retrieve my targets. I thought to myself, there must be a way to salvage my results.

    I have the target distance (599 yards) and a solid number from waterline to the center of my group (18.75”). I wrote it all down, gave it some thought, and slept on it.

    This morning I woke up with an epiphany. I will use the mil ranging formula to convert the distance of my group from the water line to see if I’m on it!

    My ballistic calculator tells me I need 5.01 mils to hit my target at 599 yards. I had 5.87 mils (for 650).

    5.87 - 5.01 = I was .86 mils off of where I should been.

    I need to figure out how many inches .86 is at 599 yards.

    I extrapolated a mil target size formula based on a Ranging formula as follows:

    Yards x Target Size in Mils / 27.8 = Target Size in Inches.

    599 x .86 / 27.8 = 18.53”

    My group was 18.75” from my Waterline. I basically moved my waterline up to the elevation I dialed in. The new center of my waterline is 18.5” higher.

    Thats a .25” difference, 1/24 MOA, from waterline to my group at 599 yards. I think Im good at that.

    Just sharing. It took my feeble brain 10 hours and sleep to process the above and salvage my results. I think its right.
    Last edited by MarikinaMan; 12-14-2020, 8:29 AM.
  • #2
    smoothy8500
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3846

    That was a good use of the formula, whether it is for an unknown distance, target size, or correction value. Sounds like your ballistic calc was right on too.

    Comment

    Working...
    UA-8071174-1