Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

922r questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sava6e
    Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 289

    922r questions

    Here it goes, I've read on some forums that people refinish their stock and furniture and then call it us made. Im sorta unclear as to why that becomes classified as us made? and if its true. Furthermore if im building a rifle and modify a part, does it become us made?
  • #2
    BigMac
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 1117

    No, modifying a imported part does not make it American made.

    This comes up in the semi modification of demilled machine guns. Even if you take a bolt and change the way it works... it's still a imported bolt.
    If you refinish an HK, it's still German.
    gunnutsnospam@sbcglobal.net

    Comment

    • #3
      sava6e
      Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 289

      well thats what i thought, but then what logic do people have in saying they refinish their ak stock and consider it a compliant part?

      Comment

      • #4
        thedrickel
        Calguns Addict
        • Apr 2006
        • 5579

        Originally posted by sava6e
        well thats what i thought, but then what logic do people have in saying they refinish their ak stock and consider it a compliant part?
        Very flawed logic.
        I hate people that are full of hate.

        It's not illegal to tip for PPT!

        Comment

        • #5
          bohoki
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jan 2006
          • 20825

          Originally posted by thedrickel
          Very flawed logic.
          so you cant carve one out of imported wood?

          i hear he carved it himself out of a bigger spoon

          Comment

          • #6
            thedrickel
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2006
            • 5579

            Originally posted by bohoki
            so you cant carve one out of imported wood?

            i hear he carved it himself out of a bigger spoon
            Carving it would be manufacturing the stock, so that would count. It entered the country as a hunk of wood (or a spoon), not as a rifle stock. "He" created it out of the raw material, which happens to be of foreign origin. That's a lot different than taking a stock that was made in Europe or wherever, stripping it, slapping some oil on and calling it a US stock.
            I hate people that are full of hate.

            It's not illegal to tip for PPT!

            Comment

            • #7
              ar15barrels
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2006
              • 57157

              Originally posted by thedrickel
              Carving it would be manufacturing the stock, so that would count. It entered the country as a hunk of wood (or a spoon), not as a rifle stock. "He" created it out of the raw material, which happens to be of foreign origin. That's a lot different than taking a stock that was made in Europe or wherever, stripping it, slapping some oil on and calling it a US stock.
              How about taking a Romy G lower handguard, lopping off the pistol grip and radically re-shaping the piece before re-finishing?

              It came into the country as a pistol grip, but now it's a conventional lower handguard.
              Randall Rausch

              AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
              Handguns: www.handgunbarrels.com
              Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
              Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
              Most work done while you wait on a scheduled shop visit.

              Comment

              • #8
                bohoki
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2006
                • 20825

                Originally posted by ar15barrels
                How about taking a Romy G lower handguard, lopping off the pistol grip and radically re-shaping the piece before re-finishing?

                It came into the country as a pistol grip, but now it's a conventional lower handguard.
                that was kind of my point about the spoon

                say you carve a smaller woodend spoon out of a big wooden spoon
                did you make a spoon?

                if you wrap the stock with fiberglass isnt it a new stock since the imported stock is now just stock innards

                hopefully eventually the sporting purposes test will go out the window since guns are only legal because they are for millitary purposes hunting isnt a right guarented in the second

                and there is no better part than forign surplus millitary parts

                Comment

                • #9
                  Rascal
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 1053

                  Originally posted by ar15barrels
                  How about taking a Romy G lower handguard, lopping off the pistol grip and radically re-shaping the piece before re-finishing?

                  It came into the country as a pistol grip, but now it's a conventional lower handguard.
                  NO, that is modifying the handguard, not manufacturing a new handguard.
                  Lopping off the pistol grip is removing the restricted "evil" feature.
                  You can have a 100% foreign made weapon, but it can't have "non-sporting" features on it according to 922r
                  Rascal

                  "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." B.Franklin

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    sava6e
                    Member
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 289

                    ok back to the spoon example: what if you have the big spoon originally but now you only make the handle smaller, basically converting a cetme hammer to a semi auto requires the removal of the notch for the burst latch i.e. grinding it off.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      thedrickel
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 5579

                      Originally posted by sava6e
                      ok back to the spoon example: what if you have the big spoon originally but now you only make the handle smaller, basically converting a cetme hammer to a semi auto requires the removal of the notch for the burst latch i.e. grinding it off.
                      You started with a FA foreign hammer. You modified it to a semi-auto foreign hammer. It's still a foreign hammer.

                      You have to remake it into something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT for it to count as a US made part. Like, say you took a foreign made hammer, ground it down into a sear or trigger. THEN you would have a US sear or trigger.
                      Last edited by thedrickel; 06-27-2008, 11:53 PM.
                      I hate people that are full of hate.

                      It's not illegal to tip for PPT!

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        motorhead
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 3409

                        a romy h/g is not a p/g for 922r purposes. mods which change the function of the part are said to be acceptable. if you accept the refinished furniture logic, go to hf anf buy some letter stamps. stamp usa on any parts you choose. doesn't fly. nor do us parts require marking. if it were a 922 part, making a fsb/gb combo would probably qualify.(it aint)
                        sigpic Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Builder
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2006
                          • 565

                          Section [18 U.S.C. 922(r):
                          (r) It shall be unlawful for any person to assemble from imported
                          parts any semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun which is identical to
                          any rifle or shotgun prohibited from importation under section
                          925(d)(3) of this chapter as not being particularly suitable for or
                          readily adaptable to sporting purposes except that this subsection
                          shall not apply to -
                          (1) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for sale or
                          distribution by a licensed manufacturer to the United States or
                          any department or agency thereof or to any State or any
                          department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or
                          (2) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for the purposes
                          of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.

                          Section [18 U.S.C. 925(d)(3):
                          (d) The Attorney General shall authorize a firearm or ammunition
                          to be imported or brought into the United States or any possession
                          thereof if the firearm or ammunition -
                          (1) is being imported or brought in for scientific or research
                          purposes, or is for use in connection with competition or
                          training pursuant to chapter 401 of title 10;
                          (2) is an unserviceable firearm, other than a machinegun as
                          defined in section 5845(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
                          (not readily restorable to firing condition), imported or brought
                          in as a curio or museum piece;
                          (3) is of a type that does not fall within the definition of a
                          firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue
                          Code of 1986 and is generally recognized as particularly suitable
                          for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes, excluding surplus
                          military firearms, except in any case where the Attorney General
                          has not authorized the importation of the firearm pursuant to
                          this paragraph, it shall be unlawful to import any frame,
                          receiver, or barrel of such firearm which would be prohibited if
                          assembled;

                          If a rifle or shotgun is subject to 922(r), it needs to be in compliance with Title 27 Chapter 1 Section 178.39:
                          Correction: Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 478, section 478.39:
                          (a) No person shall assemble a semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun using more than 10 of the imported parts listed in paragraph (c) of this section if the assembled firearm is prohibited from importation under section 925(d)(3) as not being particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.

                          Paragraph (c) defines the following parts:
                          (1) Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings or stampings *
                          (2) Barrels *
                          (3) Barrel extensions
                          (4) Mounting blocks (trunions) *
                          (5) Muzzle attachments *
                          (6) Bolts *
                          (7) Bolt carriers *
                          (8) Operating rods
                          (9) Gas pistons *
                          (10) Trigger housings
                          (11) Triggers *
                          (12) Hammers *
                          (13) Sears
                          (14) Disconnectors *
                          (15) Buttstocks *
                          (16) Pistol grips *
                          (17) Forearms, handguards *
                          (18) Magazine bodies *
                          (19) Followers *
                          (20) Floorplates *
                          Last edited by Builder; 07-01-2008, 6:33 PM. Reason: correct CFR quote
                          Big boy's toys; turning hydrocarbons into noise!
                          Liberals & children have a similar reaction of interpreting limits as confinement rather than safety.
                          It's a fine line between naive, ignorant, stupid, & idiot.
                          Tomorrow - the greatest labor saving device of today.
                          "Rapid adoption of large-scale societal change is a bad idea." - Howard Johnson
                          sigpicLife Member

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            jacques
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2008
                            • 2478

                            Do you have a link where to find that Builder?

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Builder
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2006
                              • 565

                              Originally posted by jacques
                              Do you have a link where to find that Builder?
                              Grasshopper, you need to improve your google-fu.
                              Google "Section [18 U.S.C. 922" and 3rd is findlaw.com. But more specifically: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/caseco...ction_922.html
                              Then "Next" to section 925.
                              Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1 Part 178, section 178.39 is now known as Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 478, section 478.39 which can be found here
                              Title 27 Chapter 1 Section 178.39 is now Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 478, section 478.39
                              I learn something new everyday....
                              Thanks,
                              Builder
                              Last edited by Builder; 07-01-2008, 7:01 PM.
                              Big boy's toys; turning hydrocarbons into noise!
                              Liberals & children have a similar reaction of interpreting limits as confinement rather than safety.
                              It's a fine line between naive, ignorant, stupid, & idiot.
                              Tomorrow - the greatest labor saving device of today.
                              "Rapid adoption of large-scale societal change is a bad idea." - Howard Johnson
                              sigpicLife Member

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1