Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Interesting IDPA rule changes proposed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gryff
    CGSSA Coordinator
    • May 2006
    • 12688

    Interesting IDPA rule changes proposed

    Interesting proposed changes in the IDPA rulebook (http://members.idpa.com/Content/Rules/mywujz25.qyt.pdf). Some of the ones I found of particular note:
    • All striker fired guns will be legal in SSP (i.e. Glocks, XDs, M&Ps, etc.)
    • SSP max gun weight increased to be equal with ESP (good news for you CZ SP01 shooters)
    • Some changes in range commands. Shooter is expected to be ready within 15 seconds after Load and Make Ready command
    • If shooting in the open on way to cover, you can initiate an emergency reload while in the open if you go dry
    • Retention reloads renamed "Loaded Cylinder/Chamber Reloads," and officially prohibited from being mandated in scenario-type stages
    • Changes to the number of reloads allowed on your belt, depending upon capacity of your mags (i.e. if using <8-round mags, you can now have three on your belt instead of the original two)
    • Glocks can now run metal guide rods in SSP
    • Classifier times modified. Most are minor changes, but SSP times dramatically changed to require you to shoot much faster to move up in class
    • Big changes in how sanctioned matches are run, including a parroting of the USPSA appeals process (and the $100 appeal fee)


    Note that these are preliminary, based on the first draft of the rulebook re-write. The comment period just closed, so there will probably be some changes in some of the new rules proposals.
    My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.
  • #2
    SuperSet
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2007
    • 9048

    Havent shot IDPA in a long time but I think those changes are long overdue. Good job by the Tiger Teams.

    Comment

    • #3
      Caseless
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2005
      • 1668

      The HK P7M8 is now in SSP. Time to borrow one for the next match.

      43 oz. for a SSP 9mm daily carry gun, doesn't that detract from the IDPA founding principle?
      For a bone stock CZ SP-01, changing the rubber grip to factory plastic grip, and using the 10-rd mag makes it 38.9 oz. I guess people with 19 rd mags in free states don't want to buy 10 rounders just for IDPA.

      I want a new division-Bone Stock Factory Configuration Division.

      Comment

      • #4
        Gryff
        CGSSA Coordinator
        • May 2006
        • 12688

        Originally posted by Caseless
        43 oz. for a SSP 9mm daily carry gun, doesn't that detract from the IDPA founding principle?
        Well, it's the founder's wife who is authorizing these changes. Besides, CDP was bumped up to 42oz. a couple of years ago, and ESP has been at 43 for awhile.
        My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

        Comment

        • #5
          SuperSet
          Calguns Addict
          • Feb 2007
          • 9048

          Also looks like IDPA 3Gun DMG is dead.

          Comment

          • #6
            Gryff
            CGSSA Coordinator
            • May 2006
            • 12688

            Originally posted by SuperSet
            Also looks like IDPA 3Gun DMG is dead.
            Won't cry over that, but remember that these are the pistol rules. DMG was always treated as separate (and provisional).
            My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

            Comment

            • #7
              SuperSet
              Calguns Addict
              • Feb 2007
              • 9048

              I think it's been provisional for years now. To me, it sounds like it's dead. I shot an IDPA DMG match here in Virginia once at a local club outside Roanoke. To be honest, it sucked pretty bad.

              Comment

              • #8
                not-fishing
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 2270

                [IMG]Retention reloads renamed "Loaded Cylinder/Chamber Reloads," and officially prohibited from being mandated in scenario-type stages[/IMG]

                So much for trying to make it a little more even for revolvers.
                Spreading the WORD according to COLT. and Smith, Wesson, Ruger, HK, Sig, High Standard, Browning

                Comment

                • #9
                  Gryff
                  CGSSA Coordinator
                  • May 2006
                  • 12688

                  Originally posted by not-fishing
                  [IMG]Retention reloads renamed "Loaded Cylinder/Chamber Reloads," and officially prohibited from being mandated in scenario-type stages[/IMG]

                  So much for trying to make it a little more even for revolvers.
                  How does it hurt revolvers? The proposed rules simply say that you can't make a shooter do a retention reload if it is a scenario stage. You can still do one if you want.
                  My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1