Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

COAL Tolerance?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    BLR81
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 347

    Originally posted by Jarhead
    Best tool to measure at ogive?

    My targeted COAL is 3.115 and I'm getting 3.110 - 3.120 measuring at tip
    How did you come up with the 3.115 figure and how accurate do you think that number is?

    You could be over analyzing this. A K98 Mauser even a new reproduction is not sub moa rifle. You might be trying to squeeze out more accuracy than that rifle is capable of.

    And, unless you've actually got the prints of the chamber you could be way off the lands. The SAAMI OAL for an 8mm Mauser is 3.250.

    I have a 43 1903-A3 with a OAL to the lands of 3.424", but the SAAMI OAL is 3.340". That spec was issued in 1979, almost 36 years after my rifle was built.

    Comment

    • #17
      allenj
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 25

      Best tool to measure at ogive?
      You'll get different opinions of course on which comparator is best. The Hornady is probably the most popular, I use one made by Sinclair and like it.

      Comment

      • #18
        Jarhead
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2007
        • 2847

        Originally posted by BLR81
        How did you come up with the 3.115 figure and how accurate do you think that number is?

        You could be over analyzing this. A K98 Mauser even a new reproduction is not sub moa rifle. You might be trying to squeeze out more accuracy than that rifle is capable of.

        And, unless you've actually got the prints of the chamber you could be way off the lands. The SAAMI OAL for an 8mm Mauser is 3.250.

        I have a 43 1903-A3 with a OAL to the lands of 3.424", but the SAAMI OAL is 3.340". That spec was issued in 1979, almost 36 years after my rifle was built.
        Got my info from the Sierra Manual for 8X57 w/ 200 gr. HPBT C.O.A.L 3.115 ..........I'm probably being too anal I'm all ears though ........

        Comment

        • #19
          Jarhead
          Veteran Member
          • Feb 2007
          • 2847

          Originally posted by rcschummers
          Good stuff here, pressures because of decreased oal can be a serious issue if you are loaded to max.
          That was my concern, not knowing a tolerance on COAL, I measure the powder for every round ..........I'm not confident enough to load to Max either.

          Comment

          • #20
            BLR81
            Member
            • May 2012
            • 347

            Originally posted by Jarhead
            Got my info from the Sierra Manual for 8X57 w/ 200 gr. HPBT C.O.A.L 3.115 ..........I'm probably being too anal I'm all ears though ........
            The info in the Sierra Manual is simply the standard the Small Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers came up with so all their rifles and ammo would be compatible. As with my rifle which is .120" longer than the SAAMI standard, yours may be no where need the lands at 3.115.

            The Sierra Manual for 175gr BTHPs in my 30-06 is 3.285 which is .140" short of my rifles lands. Of course my rifle is an actual Military weapon built in 1943.

            You really need to verify the true length of your chamber. There are many ways, and you can find them on YouTube. I recommend the split neck case to start. Which ever way you try, use a new bullet with every test. A bolt action rifle will have no problem jamming a bullet .020" into the lands. So, any attempt to check can damage the ogive on the bullet and give you a bad reading on subsequent tests.

            The dole rod method is good also. One of my favorite YouTube sites does a good job of explaining how it's done. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmDi7v530Og

            One last comment; when I was working up loads for my 1903-A3, I used the Sierra recommended COAL for my powder tests. After I decided on my load I started looking for the best COAL. I started at the listed COAL and went out .100" in .010" increments. I saw little or no overall improvement. A one and a half moa rifle is going to shot one and a half moa whether you .005" or .035" off the lands.

            And remember, most of us aren't great marksmen. So, when you fire your 5 shot groups, and one is 1.5 and the next is 1.7 with a flyer or two, was it you or was it the load? I've fired the same load several times with the same COAL, and still wasn't certain.

            There is also other issues to consider like consistent neck tension. With the recommended OAL my 175gr SMK is seated so that the BT is in the shoulder and the bullet is held the entire length of the neck. Set out to the lands, the BT which doesn't touch the neck in further out, and less then 1/2 of the neck is actually touching the bullet. Plus at the Lands the cartridge doesn't fit in the magazine.

            Have fun, and remember it's not a job it's an adventure.

            Comment

            • #21
              Jarhead
              Veteran Member
              • Feb 2007
              • 2847

              Originally posted by BLR81
              The info in the Sierra Manual is simply the standard the Small Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers came up with so all their rifles and ammo would be compatible. As with my rifle which is .120" longer than the SAAMI standard, yours may be no where need the lands at 3.115.

              The Sierra Manual for 175gr BTHPs in my 30-06 is 3.285 which is .140" short of my rifles lands. Of course my rifle is an actual Military weapon built in 1943.

              You really need to verify the true length of your chamber. There are many ways, and you can find them on YouTube. I recommend the split neck case to start. Which ever way you try, use a new bullet with every test. A bolt action rifle will have no problem jamming a bullet .020" into the lands. So, any attempt to check can damage the ogive on the bullet and give you a bad reading on subsequent tests.

              The dole rod method is good also. One of my favorite YouTube sites does a good job of explaining how it's done. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmDi7v530Og

              One last comment; when I was working up loads for my 1903-A3, I used the Sierra recommended COAL for my powder tests. After I decided on my load I started looking for the best COAL. I started at the listed COAL and went out .100" in .010" increments. I saw little or no overall improvement. A one and a half moa rifle is going to shot one and a half moa whether you .005" or .035" off the lands.

              And remember, most of us aren't great marksmen. So, when you fire your 5 shot groups, and one is 1.5 and the next is 1.7 with a flyer or two, was it you or was it the load? I've fired the same load several times with the same COAL, and still wasn't certain.

              There is also other issues to consider like consistent neck tension. With the recommended OAL my 175gr SMK is seated so that the BT is in the shoulder and the bullet is held the entire length of the neck. Set out to the lands, the BT which doesn't touch the neck in further out, and less then 1/2 of the neck is actually touching the bullet. Plus at the Lands the cartridge doesn't fit in the magazine.

              Have fun, and remember it's not a job it's an adventure.
              I just started prepping brass for 7.62 X51 for my M-40 & M-40A1 but the next batch will be 30-06 for a 1903 / 1941 USMC replica sniper plus my replica M-70 Sniper.

              Now on the 7.62 I'm trying to duplicate the Black Hills Match which shot pretty good out of both, using BH once fired brass.

              I'm having fun ........

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1