Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Q's regarding .204 Ruger

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BlK Lantern
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 296

    Q's regarding .204 Ruger

    ALCON:

    A friend of mine was talking about the .204 Ruger Cartridge. I'm not finding too much feedback regarding this cartridge. I like feedback from anyone who has used this cartridge (target, hunting, etc...)?

    Thank you,
    http://youtu.be/Vom9iLDfb-Y
  • #2
    ElvenSoul
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2008
    • 17431

    It eats barrels

    Try 6mm turbo
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      Spyder
      CGN Contributor
      • Mar 2008
      • 17142

      Had a 24" AR in it. Did awesome things to jackrabbit heads at 50 yards. There's better rounds out there though that are just as fast with a heavier bullet...although it was pretty cool to run in an AR.

      Comment

      • #4
        Divernhunter
        Calguns Addict
        • May 2010
        • 8753

        I have a Savage varmit barrel rifle in 204Ruger. It is an excellent cartridge. It is actually quite popular. I also have a Rem varmit rifle in 223. They both work.
        I do not see it being hard on barrels.
        It is a neat little cartridge. I use mine at the range and for shooting squirrels and PD's when I am in Wy.
        A 30cal will reach out and touch them. A 50cal will kick their butt.
        NRA Life Member, NRA certified RSO & Basic Pistol Instructor, Hunter, shooter, reloader
        SCI, Manteca Sportsmen Club, Coalinga Rifle Club, Escalon Sportsmans Club, Waterford Sportsman Club & NAHA Member, Madison Society member

        Comment

        • #5
          mjmagee67
          Veteran Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 2771

          Originally posted by ElvenSoul
          It eats barrels

          Try 6mm turbo
          BS it is no harder than 223 on a barrel.

          It's a great little cartridge, no harder load than 223, very accurate, very flat shooting, but brass is hard to find , but it's not hard on brass at all and you can neck size only! I love my 204 and may get another.
          If you want change you have to put in your 2 cents, you can't just sit on the sidelines and whine.

          Comment

          • #6
            primers
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2009
            • 659

            Have to disagree on burning barrels out....been running Ruger Mk3 for last 5 or 6 years at 6 too 8 hundred rounds a session...anywhere from 1 to 4 sessions a year with no apparent loss of accuracy or performance from rifle....prairie dogs do not like this round ....anywhere within 4 hundred yards or closer.....

            Comment

            • #7
              'ol shooter
              Veteran Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 4646

              Have a friend who is an avid P-dog shooter and loader as well as an FFL, so he can buy whatever he wants. He said he could not get the .204 to shoot as well as he wanted, so he re-barreled to .260 Rem. He says it is now a tack driver.
              sigpic
              Bob B.
              (\__/)
              (='.'=)
              (")_(")

              Comment

              • #8
                ElvenSoul
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Apr 2008
                • 17431

                Well White Oak advised me against the chambering...back in 2009.
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #9
                  Fjold
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 22997

                  It's the 222 Remington magnum round necked down to 20 caliber. It's suitable for short to medium range small game and varmint (up to coyotes). It's not used much for any type of target shooting because of the limited availability of true match grade bullets in .20 caliber and the lightweight bullets are very fickle in the wind.
                  Frank

                  One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




                  Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Sky_DiveR
                    Veteran Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 3017

                    Isn't 260 Rem kinda overkill for Squeeks?

                    Btw, I went with the 20 Practical. Uses 223Rem cases necked down to 20cal. Dies are cheap and barrels are reasonable. No fireforming either. Almost the same ballistic as the 204.
                    Last edited by Sky_DiveR; 01-03-2014, 8:43 PM.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      hntnnut
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 1066

                      Originally posted by ElvenSoul
                      It eats barrels

                      Try 6mm turbo
                      Can you back this up with facts and not just assumptions, cuz I call bull****.


                      Richard
                      Last edited by hntnnut; 01-04-2014, 1:38 PM.
                      "This country with it's institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing goverment, they can excercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismemember or overthrow it."
                      Abe Lincoln

                      ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Fjold
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 22997

                        Originally posted by Sky_DiveR
                        Isn't 260 Rem kinda overkill for Squeeks?
                        It depends on how far you are shooting them. I use my 6.5x284 with the 142 grain SMK for prairie dogs but I start shooting them at 600 yards.
                        Frank

                        One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




                        Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Sky_DiveR
                          Veteran Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 3017

                          Thats pretty amazing. I don't think I can even see a squeek at 600yds. much less shoot one. I'm only effective out to ~400yds with a 22-250 using a 69gr SMK. Never tried to use anything bigger.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          UA-8071174-1