Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

C.O.L question .223

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dsal_13
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 782

    C.O.L question .223

    My col us 2'200 if I am at 2'202 bad? Obviously is over... Or if I'm at 2'198 bad or.good?
    "An armed society is a polite society"
  • #2
    tujungatoes
    Calguns Addict
    • Dec 2006
    • 7942

    .002" either way shouldn't make any difference.
    sigpic
    Originally posted by Dr. Elky
    If your a man who wears white sunglasses, your probably a douche bag
    Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
    I've been know to cross dress and go the other way at certain events.

    Comment

    • #3
      BruinGuy
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 1456

      I recently had a similar question. It sounds like you are getting very close and the variation could be any minor thing, including how tightly you're holding the calipers!

      I was getting greater differences, and got a lot of helpful feedback here:

      Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
      Keep in mind that you don't have a clue.

      Comment

      • #4
        gemini1
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 2230

        Should be fine. When I initially set my coal at 2.250, I usually get variations from 2.247-2.255 and it all shoots with no ill effects. These are for load charge that are between min/max.

        Comment

        • #5
          ireload
          Veteran Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 2589

          You'll be fine. I've gotten .005 to .010 and never had any problem. There are several factors that come into play for the variations. The bullet's nose profile is not uniform, bullet's lenght is not uniform, the bottom part of the brass has a burr or un-evenness, dirt on the contact face of the caliper, caliper's dial gauge is not calibrated.
          Last edited by ireload; 08-13-2013, 5:52 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            ExtremeX
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2010
            • 7160

            I wouldn’t worry about it and it sounds normal to see that when measuring from tip to tip.

            Personally I only use COAL is a rough guide when bullet seating. I almost always see some variation even when dealing with match projectiles.

            A measurement which would be more of a concern if I saw large variations is from the bullet ogive to the case head. When using a competition seater and good match bullets, and a bullet comparator attachment I can pretty much see next to zero variation from cartridge to cartridge when measuring from the ogive.

            Primers which were also seated high can obscure the measurement so it’s something to take note of.
            ExtremeX

            Comment

            • #7
              GeoffLinder
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2009
              • 2425

              2.200" is pretty short for most .223 bullets, especially a 55gr. Better range to work in is 2.220 to 2.240. 2.255-2.260 is about as long as you want to go for safe magazine fit in AR's

              Comment

              • #8
                Dsal_13
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2013
                • 782

                Originally posted by GeoffLinder
                2.200" is pretty short for most .223 bullets, especially a 55gr. Better range to work in is 2.220 to 2.240. 2.255-2.260 is about as long as you want to go for safe magazine fit in AR's
                I just threw a random number... it was more for example purposes
                "An armed society is a polite society"

                Comment

                • #9
                  GeoffLinder
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 2425

                  Originally posted by Dsal_13
                  I just threw a random number... it was more for example purposes
                  Now you have the correct numbers

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1